Therapeutic Inertia of Hypertension and Physician Logic

Background: Therapeutic Inertia (TI), the lack of escalation or initiation of blood pressure (BP) lowering medications during clinic visits with BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg occurs in majority of clinic visits among older adults. It remains a major barrier for achieving BP control. We reviewed a random selection of university affiliated outpatient primary care clinics with documented TI to elucidate reasons for not escalating treatment. Methods: The source population included 7215 patients aged ≥65 with ICD-10 diagnosis of hypertension and ≥1 visit with uncontrolled BP at a university-affiliated clinic from January 2019 to December 2020. Uncontrolled BP was defined as a clinic systolic BP ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg confirmed with blood pressure measured 3 times in 1-minute intervals and averaged. Two investigators reviewed 101 unique patient outpatient clinic visits with documented TI in source population. A priori, reasons for TI were categorized as acute symptoms/illness, stress/pain, noncompliance, patient refusal, side effects and documentation of home BP < 140/90 mmHg. If more than one reason was present in a note, all reasons were included. Results: The mean age of the 101 patients was 76.2 years (Standard Deviation [SD] 8.7) during the clinic visist. Comorbidities included diabetes mellitus in 35%, chronic kidney disease in 13% and cardiovascular diseases in 35%; 90% were covered by Medicare insurance. The mean total number of BP lowering medications was 1.8 (SD 0.92). Overall, 38% of charts lacked documentation justifying the TI; 51% overall had uncontrolled blood pressure at the subsequent clinic visit. Figure 1 shows the documented reasons for TI. Acute medical illness was the most common justification found(17%). No encounter had documentation of orthostatic hypotension. Overall 38% of encounters lacked documentation justifying the TI. Conclusion: TI is common among older adults and may be due to clinician attention to acute illnesses, pain and stress. However, a substantial proportion of TI may not be justified.Figure 1

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.202457r7b1sw
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Psychiatry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Therapeutic Inertia of Hypertension and Physician Logic

Talar Markossian, Grant Hiura, Holly Kramer, Benjamin Strickland
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Mental Health and Psychiatry
article

Therapeutic Inertia of Hypertension and Physician Logic

Talar Markossian, Grant Hiura, Holly Kramer, Benjamin Strickland
article en

Abstract

Background: Therapeutic Inertia (TI), the lack of escalation or initiation of blood pressure (BP) lowering medications during clinic visits with BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg occurs in majority of clinic visits among older adults. It remains a major barrier for achieving BP control. We reviewed a random selection of university affiliated outpatient primary care clinics with documented TI to elucidate reasons for not escalating treatment. Methods: The source population included 7215 patients aged ≥65 with ICD-10 diagnosis of hypertension and ≥1 visit with uncontrolled BP at a university-affiliated clinic from January 2019 to December 2020. Uncontrolled BP was defined as a clinic systolic BP ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg confirmed with blood pressure measured 3 times in 1-minute intervals and averaged. Two investigators reviewed 101 unique patient outpatient clinic visits with documented TI in source population. A priori, reasons for TI were categorized as acute symptoms/illness, stress/pain, noncompliance, patient refusal, side effects and documentation of home BP < 140/90 mmHg. If more than one reason was present in a note, all reasons were included. Results: The mean age of the 101 patients was 76.2 years (Standard Deviation [SD] 8.7) during the clinic visist. Comorbidities included diabetes mellitus in 35%, chronic kidney disease in 13% and cardiovascular diseases in 35%; 90% were covered by Medicare insurance. The mean total number of BP lowering medications was 1.8 (SD 0.92). Overall, 38% of charts lacked documentation justifying the TI; 51% overall had uncontrolled blood pressure at the subsequent clinic visit. Figure 1 shows the documented reasons for TI. Acute medical illness was the most common justification found(17%). No encounter had documentation of orthostatic hypotension. Overall 38% of encounters lacked documentation justifying the TI. Conclusion: TI is common among older adults and may be due to clinician attention to acute illnesses, pain and stress. However, a substantial proportion of TI may not be justified.Figure 1

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Mental Health and Psychiatry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.