The Difference That Makes a Difference: Derrida, Peirce and Biosemiotics

In Of Grammatology Derrida called upon Charles Sanders Peirce as a partial ally in his ‘deconstruction of the transcendental signifier’. Here Derridean thought and biodeconstruction are brought into a comparative relation with contemporary Peircean biosemiotic theory. The discussion examines an intertwining of philosophical currents and trajectories that run through both Peirce and the philosophical hinterland of biosemiotics. What can be seen to emerge here is an evolution or transformation from idealism (the legacies of Hegel and Kant in Peirce and biosemiotic thought, respectively) to a novel configuration of relational realism. This configuration is, in turn, thought alongside Derridean notions of différance, arche-writing and generalized textuality. A productive dialogue is opened up between biodeconstruction and biosemiotics. The latter can be shown to complement the former, offering a realist, post-metaphysical theoretical framework and methodology for biology that has the potential to inform the activity and research of working biologists.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Paragraph
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/para.2024.0475
Primary Topic
Origins and Evolution of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Difference That Makes a Difference: Derrida, Peirce and Biosemiotics

Ian James
Paragraph
Origins and Evolution of Life
article

The Difference That Makes a Difference: Derrida, Peirce and Biosemiotics

Ian James
article en

Abstract

In Of Grammatology Derrida called upon Charles Sanders Peirce as a partial ally in his ‘deconstruction of the transcendental signifier’. Here Derridean thought and biodeconstruction are brought into a comparative relation with contemporary Peircean biosemiotic theory. The discussion examines an intertwining of philosophical currents and trajectories that run through both Peirce and the philosophical hinterland of biosemiotics. What can be seen to emerge here is an evolution or transformation from idealism (the legacies of Hegel and Kant in Peirce and biosemiotic thought, respectively) to a novel configuration of relational realism. This configuration is, in turn, thought alongside Derridean notions of différance, arche-writing and generalized textuality. A productive dialogue is opened up between biodeconstruction and biosemiotics. The latter can be shown to complement the former, offering a realist, post-metaphysical theoretical framework and methodology for biology that has the potential to inform the activity and research of working biologists.

ParagraphVol. 47(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Origins and Evolution of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Difference That Makes a Difference: Derrida, Peirce and Biosemiotics — Ian James · Paragraph (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS