Comparative analysis of a novel preoperative stratification method versus traditional scores in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve surgery

Abstract Introduction It is crucial to consider factors that complicate the indication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), such as narrow valve ring, extensive calcification or inadequate vascular access. (1-4) Thus, aortic valve replacement surgery (SAVR) remains a recommended indication, with its pre-surgical stratification being a challenge. (1-3) Despite the widespread use of scores like the STS and EuroSCORE II, they exhibit limitations, being validated primarily for populations outside Latin America and focusing predominantly on individual factors while often neglecting structural parameters like left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, or left atrium volume. (3-5) Purpose This study aimed to assess whether a novel modified Généreux stratification method offers superior predictive value for postoperative mortality in AS patients compared to traditional scoring systems. Methods We conducted a retrospective, single-center study involving patients with confirmed severe AS who underwent aortic valve replacement surgery between January 2017 and December 2021. The new stratification method categorized patients into three stages based on echocardiographic parameters (see Figure 1). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of mortality, with survival analysis performed using Kaplan-Meier curves. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 508 patients were included in the study. Stage 1 patients had a lower median age (62 years vs. 67 years in stages 2 and 3). The median EuroSCORE and STS were 2.75 and 2.62%, respectively, with stage 3 showing significantly higher scores (p ≤0.001). Over a median follow-up of 81 months, 56 deaths occurred (11%). Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed significant differences in all-cause mortality among the three groups (HR 4.073, log-rank p≤0.001), as illustrated in Figure 1. Multivariate analysis identified the three preoperative stages (HR 3.22, [95% CI 1.44-7.20], p=0.004) and mean transaortic gradient (HR 0.96, [95% CI 0.92-0.99], p=0.021) as independent predictors of mortality. The new stages demonstrated a superior area under the ROC curve of 0.758 compared to traditional scores (see Figure 1). Conclusions The novel three-stage preoperative classification and low transaortic gradient serve as significant predictors of mortality in patients undergoing SAVR. These stages exhibit robust predictive capability for mortality compared to EuroSCORE II and STS.Baseline and multivariate analysisKaplan-meier and ROC curve