Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Real Life (T-ACI): A Prospective Single-Center Observational Study

<b>Background:</b> Carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> (CRAB) poses significant challenges in healthcare due to its multidrug resistance and high mortality rates among critically ill patients. <b>Results:</b> We enrolled 45 patients. Cefiderocol was administered to 40% of patients, often (38.8%) in combination with other antibiotics. Colistin was administered to 60% of patients and always in combination, mostly with ampicillin-sulbactam. The overall ECS and OCS rates were 77.8% and 66.7%, respectively. Patients treated with an initial cefiderocol-based regimen showed a higher rate of ECS compared with patients initially treated with colistin-based regimens (100% vs. 63%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Patients treated with cefiderocol alone showed a higher rate of ECS compared with patients treated with cefiderocol-based regimens (100% vs. 70.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). No differences in OCS rates were recorded depending on the treatment received. Additionally, cefiderocol regimens were associated with fewer ADRs compared to colistin-based treatment. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective observational study enrolled patients with CRAB infections from January 2022 to August 2023. Patients were treated with cefiderocol-based or colistin-based regimens and were monitored for 28 days to assess early clinical success (ECS), overall clinical success (OCS) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). <b>Conclusions:</b> This study highlights the potential advantages of cefiderocol, even used as a monotherapy, in treating CRAB, especially when early clinical and laboratory response was assessed. This research contributes to the ongoing discussion on the most effective and safe treatments for combating CRAB infections, supporting the use of cefiderocol in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antibiotics
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13111007
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Real Life (T-ACI): A Prospective Single-Center Observational Study

Nunzia Esposito, Giulio Viceconte, Giulia Zumbo, Antonio Riccardo Buonomo et al.
2 citations
Antibiotics
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
0.34
article

Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Real Life (T-ACI): A Prospective Single-Center Observational Study

Nunzia Esposito, Giulio Viceconte, Giulia Zumbo, Antonio Riccardo Buonomo, Carmine Iacovazzo, Nicola Schiano Moriello, Francesco Curcio, Amedeo Lanzardo, Riccardo Scotto, Emanuela Roscetto, Ivan Gentile, Ilaria Vecchietti
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> (CRAB) poses significant challenges in healthcare due to its multidrug resistance and high mortality rates among critically ill patients. <b>Results:</b> We enrolled 45 patients. Cefiderocol was administered to 40% of patients, often (38.8%) in combination with other antibiotics. Colistin was administered to 60% of patients and always in combination, mostly with ampicillin-sulbactam. The overall ECS and OCS rates were 77.8% and 66.7%, respectively. Patients treated with an initial cefiderocol-based regimen showed a higher rate of ECS compared with patients initially treated with colistin-based regimens (100% vs. 63%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Patients treated with cefiderocol alone showed a higher rate of ECS compared with patients treated with cefiderocol-based regimens (100% vs. 70.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). No differences in OCS rates were recorded depending on the treatment received. Additionally, cefiderocol regimens were associated with fewer ADRs compared to colistin-based treatment. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective observational study enrolled patients with CRAB infections from January 2022 to August 2023. Patients were treated with cefiderocol-based or colistin-based regimens and were monitored for 28 days to assess early clinical success (ECS), overall clinical success (OCS) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). <b>Conclusions:</b> This study highlights the potential advantages of cefiderocol, even used as a monotherapy, in treating CRAB, especially when early clinical and laboratory response was assessed. This research contributes to the ongoing discussion on the most effective and safe treatments for combating CRAB infections, supporting the use of cefiderocol in clinical practice.

AntibioticsVol. 13(11)
Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.