Transparant and Trustworthy Artifact Life Cycle

In scholarly communication, alternative publication platforms are rising, offering services that are not tied to and function independently from traditional publishers. Decentralized and decoupled versions of value-adding services such as overlay journals, peer review and endorsement services are provided to the network. These alternatives address not only the massive monopolization of scholarly communication but also new demands for rapid distribution of scholarly artifacts in fields such as life sciences. They also accommodate for new publication formats such as data sets and source code that are beyond the traditional paper. Event Notifications provide an asynchronous point-to-point messaging protocol that acts as an interoperability layer between the nodes in such networks. Event Logs are a proposal to provide full transparency in the scholarly process by publishing public resources on each node containing lifecycle information pertaining to the scholarly artifacts in the network. Trust in Event Logs require some form of machine-verifiability because trust by reputation of each node is not scalable in large networks. This paper presents a pragmatic approach to building trust without relying on costly blockchain technologies, which lack sustainable long-term strategies. By using trusted archival nodes within Event Notification networks and Event Logs, we propose a decentralized, transparent, and trustworthy alternative to traditional scholarly communication systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21428/5676bf2d.a76a90cf
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transparant and Trustworthy Artifact Life Cycle

Patrick Hochstenbach, Ruben Verborgh, Martin Klein, Herbert Van de Sompel
1 citations
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
1.96
article

Transparant and Trustworthy Artifact Life Cycle

Patrick Hochstenbach, Ruben Verborgh, Martin Klein, Herbert Van de Sompel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In scholarly communication, alternative publication platforms are rising, offering services that are not tied to and function independently from traditional publishers. Decentralized and decoupled versions of value-adding services such as overlay journals, peer review and endorsement services are provided to the network. These alternatives address not only the massive monopolization of scholarly communication but also new demands for rapid distribution of scholarly artifacts in fields such as life sciences. They also accommodate for new publication formats such as data sets and source code that are beyond the traditional paper. Event Notifications provide an asynchronous point-to-point messaging protocol that acts as an interoperability layer between the nodes in such networks. Event Logs are a proposal to provide full transparency in the scholarly process by publishing public resources on each node containing lifecycle information pertaining to the scholarly artifacts in the network. Trust in Event Logs require some form of machine-verifiability because trust by reputation of each node is not scalable in large networks. This paper presents a pragmatic approach to building trust without relying on costly blockchain technologies, which lack sustainable long-term strategies. By using trusted archival nodes within Event Notification networks and Event Logs, we propose a decentralized, transparent, and trustworthy alternative to traditional scholarly communication systems.

Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), Ghent University (BE), Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (NL)
Vlaamse regering
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.