Comparative Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG–PET–CT and Intraoperative Examination in Cervical Cancer Staging

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: The primary objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of 18F-FDG-PET-CT in preoperative staging of cervical cancer, focusing on determining surgical operability and exploring the correlation between its quantitative parameters and clinicopathological characteristics. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This retrospective study included 62 cervical cancer patients treated at the Department of Gynecology, Clinic for Operative Oncology at the Institute of Oncology Vojvodina between January 2016 and January 2020, where preoperative clinical examinations and 18F-FDG-PET-CT were performed to assess the extent of cancer, followed by intraoperative and pathohistological examinations of surgically removed specimens to provide a comprehensive evaluation. <i>Results</i>: The mean tumor size measured by 18F-FDG-PET-CT was slightly greater than that obtained through clinical examination (26.4 mm vs. 26.0 mm), with a strong linear correlation (r = 0.678, <i>p</i> < 0.001) observed between the two measurement methods. The overall prediction accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET-CT for primary tumors is 88.7% (55/62) [sensitivity 86.8%, specificity 100.0%, PPV 100.0%, NPV 56.2%] and for intraoperative examination is 88.7% (55/62) [sensitivity 98.1%, specificity 33.3%, PPV 89.7%, NPV 75.0%]. The agreement with histopathological examination was good for 18F-FDG-PET-CT and moderate for intraoperative examination for primary tumors. Regarding lymph nodes, the overall prediction accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET-CT is 82.2% (51/62) [sensitivity 53.8%, specificity 89.8%, PPV 58.3%, NPV 88.8%] and for intraoperative examination 66.1% (41/62) [sensitivity 76.9%, specificity 63.3%, PPV 35.7%, NPV 91.2%]. The agreement with histopathological examination was moderate for 18F-FDG-PET-CT and poor for intraoperative examination for lymph node metastasis, highlighting that the overall accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET-CT (82.1%) was significantly higher than that of intraoperative examination (66.1%) (<i>p</i> = 0.002). <i>Conclusions</i>: In conclusion, 18F-FDG-PET-CT provides high accuracy in detecting primary tumors and superior predictive value for lymph node metastases compared to intraoperative examination, highlighting the importance of incorporating this imaging modality into the preoperative evaluation process to enhance diagnostic precision and inform treatment decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111758
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG–PET–CT and Intraoperative Examination in Cervical Cancer Staging

Goran Malenković, Jelena Malenković, Armin Šljivo, Slobodan Tomić et al.
Medicina
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Comparative Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG–PET–CT and Intraoperative Examination in Cervical Cancer Staging

Goran Malenković, Jelena Malenković, Armin Šljivo, Slobodan Tomić, Sanja Tomić, Fatima Gavrankapetanović-Smailbegović
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: The primary objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of 18F-FDG-PET-CT in preoperative staging of cervical cancer, focusing on determining surgical operability and exploring the correlation between its quantitative parameters and clinicopathological characteristics. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This retrospective study included 62 cervical cancer patients treated at the Department of Gynecology, Clinic for Operative Oncology at the Institute of Oncology Vojvodina between January 2016 and January 2020, where preoperative clinical examinations and 18F-FDG-PET-CT were performed to assess the extent of cancer, followed by intraoperative and pathohistological examinations of surgically removed specimens to provide a comprehensive evaluation. <i>Results</i>: The mean tumor size measured by 18F-FDG-PET-CT was slightly greater than that obtained through clinical examination (26.4 mm vs. 26.0 mm), with a strong linear correlation (r = 0.678, <i>p</i> < 0.001) observed between the two measurement methods. The overall prediction accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET-CT for primary tumors is 88.7% (55/62) [sensitivity 86.8%, specificity 100.0%, PPV 100.0%, NPV 56.2%] and for intraoperative examination is 88.7% (55/62) [sensitivity 98.1%, specificity 33.3%, PPV 89.7%, NPV 75.0%]. The agreement with histopathological examination was good for 18F-FDG-PET-CT and moderate for intraoperative examination for primary tumors. Regarding lymph nodes, the overall prediction accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET-CT is 82.2% (51/62) [sensitivity 53.8%, specificity 89.8%, PPV 58.3%, NPV 88.8%] and for intraoperative examination 66.1% (41/62) [sensitivity 76.9%, specificity 63.3%, PPV 35.7%, NPV 91.2%]. The agreement with histopathological examination was moderate for 18F-FDG-PET-CT and poor for intraoperative examination for lymph node metastasis, highlighting that the overall accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET-CT (82.1%) was significantly higher than that of intraoperative examination (66.1%) (<i>p</i> = 0.002). <i>Conclusions</i>: In conclusion, 18F-FDG-PET-CT provides high accuracy in detecting primary tumors and superior predictive value for lymph node metastases compared to intraoperative examination, highlighting the importance of incorporating this imaging modality into the preoperative evaluation process to enhance diagnostic precision and inform treatment decisions.

MedicinaVol. 60(11)
University of Sarajevo (BA), University of Novi Sad (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.