Delving into depth: an empirical investigation of the ordinary concepts of depth and profundity

Abstract We sometimes say about certain things (such as philosophical questions) that they are ‘deep’ or ‘profound’. But what does it mean exactly? Surprisingly, philosophers have been quite silent on this topic and there is neither consensual nor prominent conceptual analysis of ‘depth’. After surveying different proposals that have tried to capture depth in terms of explanatory depth, subject matter, emotional impact, understanding or complexity, we present the results of three studies in which we combine qualitative and quantitative methods to investigate the everyday concept of ‘depth’. Our results suggest that depth and profundity are generally characterized as (i) something with a meaning, (ii) that stimulates cognitive activity, to (iii) promote epistemic progress about (iv) important issues, thus (v) having an emotional impact. Based on these findings, we propose a first characterization of the ordinary concepts of depth and profundity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Synthese
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04786-7
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delving into depth: an empirical investigation of the ordinary concepts of depth and profundity

Céline Schöpfer, Florián Cova, Morgane Myling Bezat
4 citations
Synthese
Cultural Differences and Values
2.57
article

Delving into depth: an empirical investigation of the ordinary concepts of depth and profundity

Céline Schöpfer, Florián Cova, Morgane Myling Bezat
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract We sometimes say about certain things (such as philosophical questions) that they are ‘deep’ or ‘profound’. But what does it mean exactly? Surprisingly, philosophers have been quite silent on this topic and there is neither consensual nor prominent conceptual analysis of ‘depth’. After surveying different proposals that have tried to capture depth in terms of explanatory depth, subject matter, emotional impact, understanding or complexity, we present the results of three studies in which we combine qualitative and quantitative methods to investigate the everyday concept of ‘depth’. Our results suggest that depth and profundity are generally characterized as (i) something with a meaning, (ii) that stimulates cognitive activity, to (iii) promote epistemic progress about (iv) important issues, thus (v) having an emotional impact. Based on these findings, we propose a first characterization of the ordinary concepts of depth and profundity.

SyntheseVol. 204(5)
University of Geneva (CH)
Université de Genève
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cultural Differences and Values
2.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Delving into depth: an empirical investigation of the ordinary concepts of depth and profundity — Céline Schöpfer, Florián Cova, et al. · Synthese (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS