Election-Denying Republican Candidates Underperformed in the 2022 Midterms

We combine newly collected election data with records of public denials of the results of the 2020 election to estimate the degree to which election-denying Republican candidates over- or underperformed other Republicans in 2022 in statewide and federal elections. We find that the average vote share of election-denying Republicans in statewide races was approximately 3.2 percentage points lower than their co-partisans after accounting for state-level partisanship. However, we find no such underperformance on aggregate for U.S. House elections, perhaps due to the more-partisan nature of many House districts. Together, the results suggest that the types of candidates in American elections who take more-extreme positions tend to underperform, but that these performance gaps are relatively small in the present, polarized political environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Political Science Review
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055424001084
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
22.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Election-Denying Republican Candidates Underperformed in the 2022 Midterms

Andrew B. Hall, JANET MALZAHN
13 citations
American Political Science Review
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
22.31
article

Election-Denying Republican Candidates Underperformed in the 2022 Midterms

Andrew B. Hall, JANET MALZAHN
article en
13 citations

Abstract

We combine newly collected election data with records of public denials of the results of the 2020 election to estimate the degree to which election-denying Republican candidates over- or underperformed other Republicans in 2022 in statewide and federal elections. We find that the average vote share of election-denying Republicans in statewide races was approximately 3.2 percentage points lower than their co-partisans after accounting for state-level partisanship. However, we find no such underperformance on aggregate for U.S. House elections, perhaps due to the more-partisan nature of many House districts. Together, the results suggest that the types of candidates in American elections who take more-extreme positions tend to underperform, but that these performance gaps are relatively small in the present, polarized political environment.

American Political Science ReviewVol. 119(3)
Stanford University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
22.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.