OSDOKINA crush technique for the management of side branch ostial lesion ISTANBOL study

Abstract Background Isolated ostial bifurcation lesions (Medina type 0.0.1) represent <20% of coronary bifurcation lesions. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of this subset of lesions is challenging for the interventional cardiologist because of the technical difficulty and potential risk of serious complications. Purposes Recently, we devised a new technique, called the OSDOKINA crush technique, for the treatment of Medina type 0.0.1 coronary bifurcation lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety and short-term and midterm procedural and clinical results achieved with OSDOKINA crush technique for Medina type 0.0.1 coronary bifurcation lesions. Materials and Methods Between September 2020 and January 2024, we included 49 patients who had Medina type 0,0,1 coronary bifurcation lesions. The vessel size had to be ≥2.5 mm by visual estimation on coronary angiography. Demographic, clinical and lesion characteristics of the cases were recorded. Quantitative coronary angiography analyses were performed using dedicated bifurcation angiographic software. Procedural success was defined as successful implantation of the stent into the target lesion, causing a final residual stenosis ≤30%. Major adverse cardiac events(MACE) were defined as cardiac death, myocard infarction and target lesion revascularisation. All patients were followed up to twelve months after the intervention. Results The lesion localisations were the ostium of diagonal branch in 19 (38.7%), ostium of the obtuse marginalis branch in 17 (34.6%), ostium of right posterior descending or right posterolateral branch in 13 (26.7%). SB RVD, SB lesion length and SB diameter stenosis by QCA were 2.65±0.35 mm, 9.4±3.9 mm, and 79.8±12.6, respectively. SB predilatation was applied in all cases. In 1 patient (2.1%), a stent had to be placed in the main branch using the double-kissing mini crush technique due to flow-limiting dissection that developed after the second kissing balloon inflation. Considering all cases, the angiographic success rate was 97.9% (n: 48). All patients had 12-month follow-up results. Acute myocardial infarction occurred in 1 patient (2.1%) due to side branch stent thrombosis. No patient had main branch revascularization. Cardiac or non-cardiac death was not observed. Cumulative MACE was 2.1%(n:1). Conclusion The OSDOKINA crush technique has excellent acute results and midterm clinical outcomes in the management of Medina type 0.0.1 coronary bifurcation lesions. Multicenter studies with large patient groups are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2401
Primary Topic
Ear and Head Tumors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OSDOKINA crush technique for the management of side branch ostial lesion ISTANBOL study

Ethem Acar, İsa Sıncer, İbrahim Akın İzgi, Cevat Kırma et al.
European Heart Journal
Ear and Head Tumors
article

OSDOKINA crush technique for the management of side branch ostial lesion ISTANBOL study

Ethem Acar, İsa Sıncer, İbrahim Akın İzgi, Cevat Kırma, İbrahim Dönmez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Isolated ostial bifurcation lesions (Medina type 0.0.1) represent <20% of coronary bifurcation lesions. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of this subset of lesions is challenging for the interventional cardiologist because of the technical difficulty and potential risk of serious complications. Purposes Recently, we devised a new technique, called the OSDOKINA crush technique, for the treatment of Medina type 0.0.1 coronary bifurcation lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety and short-term and midterm procedural and clinical results achieved with OSDOKINA crush technique for Medina type 0.0.1 coronary bifurcation lesions. Materials and Methods Between September 2020 and January 2024, we included 49 patients who had Medina type 0,0,1 coronary bifurcation lesions. The vessel size had to be ≥2.5 mm by visual estimation on coronary angiography. Demographic, clinical and lesion characteristics of the cases were recorded. Quantitative coronary angiography analyses were performed using dedicated bifurcation angiographic software. Procedural success was defined as successful implantation of the stent into the target lesion, causing a final residual stenosis ≤30%. Major adverse cardiac events(MACE) were defined as cardiac death, myocard infarction and target lesion revascularisation. All patients were followed up to twelve months after the intervention. Results The lesion localisations were the ostium of diagonal branch in 19 (38.7%), ostium of the obtuse marginalis branch in 17 (34.6%), ostium of right posterior descending or right posterolateral branch in 13 (26.7%). SB RVD, SB lesion length and SB diameter stenosis by QCA were 2.65±0.35 mm, 9.4±3.9 mm, and 79.8±12.6, respectively. SB predilatation was applied in all cases. In 1 patient (2.1%), a stent had to be placed in the main branch using the double-kissing mini crush technique due to flow-limiting dissection that developed after the second kissing balloon inflation. Considering all cases, the angiographic success rate was 97.9% (n: 48). All patients had 12-month follow-up results. Acute myocardial infarction occurred in 1 patient (2.1%) due to side branch stent thrombosis. No patient had main branch revascularization. Cardiac or non-cardiac death was not observed. Cumulative MACE was 2.1%(n:1). Conclusion The OSDOKINA crush technique has excellent acute results and midterm clinical outcomes in the management of Medina type 0.0.1 coronary bifurcation lesions. Multicenter studies with large patient groups are needed.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Kartal Koşuyolu High Specialization Training and Research Hospital (TR), Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Ear and Head Tumors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.