Outcomes of CT- or CMR-guided TAVR according to sex: a secondary analysis of the randomized TAVR-CMR trial

Abstract Background Previous studies have reported sex differences in pre-procedural imaging characteristics of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) evaluation. Whether these differences affect the outcome of computed tomography (CT)-guided or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-guided TAVR has not been studied. Objectives This analysis aimed to evaluate sex-based differences in imaging findings and outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic valve stenosis. Methods This was a secondary analysis of the TAVR-CMR trial, a randomized clinical trial comparing TAVR planning by CT or CMR. Outcomes (based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)–2 definition) with each imaging strategy were compared according to sex. Results Of 380 patient randomized into the TAVR-CMR trial, 194 (51.1%) were female and 186 (48.9%) were male. Of these, 267 patients eventually underwent TAVR (133 women (49.8%) and 134 men (50.2%), p=0.457). Imaging findings differed between the sexes for both imaging modalities. The comparison between CT and CMR to assess the access route and landing zone showed no difference in both women and men (all p>0.05). Implantation success was not significantly different between imaging strategies for both women (84.7% (CT group) vs. 93.2% (CMR group), p=0.11) and men (95.7% (CT group) vs. 93.8% (CMR group), p=0.61). All-cause mortality at 6 months was not significantly different between imaging strategies for both women (10.2% (CT group) vs. 8.1% (CMR group), p=0.68) and men (4.3% (CT group) vs. 9.4% (CMR group), p=0.24). Conclusions This secondary analysis has confirmed sex-related differences in pre-procedural imaging characteristics, with no influence of the imaging modality used. Similar outcomes were observed in both female and male patients when the TAVR was guided by either a CMR or a CT scan.