Cultural Adaptation and Evaluation of Evidence for Validity of a Gender Minority Stress Measure among Transgender Women and Transfeminine People in China

Purpose: Gender minority stress is a culturally situated, complex construct. Despite high levels of gender minority stress reported by transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people in mainland China, measurement of this construct in this setting is not well understood. We conducted cultural adaptation of a gender minority stress measure (discrimination, rejection, victimization, nonaffirmation of gender identity, internalized transphobia, negative expectations for the future, and nondisclosure of gender identity subscales) and evaluated evidence of validity and reliability in a sample of Chinese transgender women, transfeminine people, and other gender-diverse people assigned male at birth ( n = 277). Methods: Community-engaged cultural adaptation included needs assessment, cognitive interviewing, translation, and community and academic expert consultation. Participants ( n = 277) completed an online questionnaire assessing seven stress subscales adapted from the Gender Minority Stress and Resilience (GMSR) measure (November 2019–June 2020). We conducted confirmatory factor analyses to confirm the underlying structure and examined divergent and criterion validity. Results: A confirmatory factor analysis found that a first-order seven-factor model had adequate fit and was more appropriate than a second-order model. The seven subscales had positive correlations with each other of under 0.60, which supported the divergent validity hypothesis. However, while all subscales were positively correlated with depressive symptoms, only nonaffirmation was correlated with cigarette use, suggesting partial support for the criterion validity hypothesis. Conclusion: Results suggest good evidence for validity of the GMSR stress subscales and support its future use among other Chinese TGD populations. Community-engaged methods may be beneficial for adapting complex measures across settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transgender Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2024.0028
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural Adaptation and Evaluation of Evidence for Validity of a Gender Minority Stress Measure among Transgender Women and Transfeminine People in China

Alexandra F. Lightfoot, Edwin B. Fisher, Will J. Hall, Willa Dong et al.
1 links
Transgender Health
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Cultural Adaptation and Evaluation of Evidence for Validity of a Gender Minority Stress Measure among Transgender Women and Transfeminine People in China

Alexandra F. Lightfoot, Edwin B. Fisher, Will J. Hall, Willa Dong, Lisa Hightow‐Weidman, Kathryn Elizabeth Muessig, Weiming Tang, Joseph D. Tucker, Yongjie Sha, Xi Huang
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Gender minority stress is a culturally situated, complex construct. Despite high levels of gender minority stress reported by transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people in mainland China, measurement of this construct in this setting is not well understood. We conducted cultural adaptation of a gender minority stress measure (discrimination, rejection, victimization, nonaffirmation of gender identity, internalized transphobia, negative expectations for the future, and nondisclosure of gender identity subscales) and evaluated evidence of validity and reliability in a sample of Chinese transgender women, transfeminine people, and other gender-diverse people assigned male at birth ( n = 277). Methods: Community-engaged cultural adaptation included needs assessment, cognitive interviewing, translation, and community and academic expert consultation. Participants ( n = 277) completed an online questionnaire assessing seven stress subscales adapted from the Gender Minority Stress and Resilience (GMSR) measure (November 2019–June 2020). We conducted confirmatory factor analyses to confirm the underlying structure and examined divergent and criterion validity. Results: A confirmatory factor analysis found that a first-order seven-factor model had adequate fit and was more appropriate than a second-order model. The seven subscales had positive correlations with each other of under 0.60, which supported the divergent validity hypothesis. However, while all subscales were positively correlated with depressive symptoms, only nonaffirmation was correlated with cigarette use, suggesting partial support for the criterion validity hypothesis. Conclusion: Results suggest good evidence for validity of the GMSR stress subscales and support its future use among other Chinese TGD populations. Community-engaged methods may be beneficial for adapting complex measures across settings.

Transgender Health
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of North Carolina Health Care (US), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Well Being Digital (China) (CN), Southern Medical University (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.