Preferences of parents from diverse backgrounds on genomic screening of apparently healthy newborns

Genomic sequencing has been proposed as a strategy to expand newborn screening. Perspectives on genomic newborn screening from parents of diverse racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds are needed to shape equitable implementation of this modality. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews (15 English, 5 Spanish) and seven focus groups (4 English, 3 Spanish) with parents from diverse backgrounds to assess their perspectives regarding which disorders and variants might be screened, data privacy, and barriers to pursuing specialized care. Parents felt that genomic newborn screening would provide them with improved understanding of their children's health and had the potential to yield health and personal benefits. Themes that became evident included: interest in childhood and family health risks, the value of emotional preparation and personal planning, understanding of uncertain and low-risk results, concerns regarding data privacy, and concerns about support following the receipt of a positive newborn screening result. The expected benefits and concerns expressed by parents of diverse backgrounds regarding genomic newborn screening should guide future policy decisions. Their preferences should be considered prior to the implementation of large-scale genomic newborn screening programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1994
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preferences of parents from diverse backgrounds on genomic screening of apparently healthy newborns

Ingrid A. Holm, Chung‐Yao Hsu, Sonja I. Ziniel, Maya C. del Rosario et al.
11 citations
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Genomics and Rare Diseases
6.05
article

Preferences of parents from diverse backgrounds on genomic screening of apparently healthy newborns

Ingrid A. Holm, Chung‐Yao Hsu, Sonja I. Ziniel, Maya C. del Rosario, Nina B. Gold, Greysha Rivera‐Cruz, Jacklyn Omorodion
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Genomic sequencing has been proposed as a strategy to expand newborn screening. Perspectives on genomic newborn screening from parents of diverse racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds are needed to shape equitable implementation of this modality. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews (15 English, 5 Spanish) and seven focus groups (4 English, 3 Spanish) with parents from diverse backgrounds to assess their perspectives regarding which disorders and variants might be screened, data privacy, and barriers to pursuing specialized care. Parents felt that genomic newborn screening would provide them with improved understanding of their children's health and had the potential to yield health and personal benefits. Themes that became evident included: interest in childhood and family health risks, the value of emotional preparation and personal planning, understanding of uncertain and low-risk results, concerns regarding data privacy, and concerns about support following the receipt of a positive newborn screening result. The expected benefits and concerns expressed by parents of diverse backgrounds regarding genomic newborn screening should guide future policy decisions. Their preferences should be considered prior to the implementation of large-scale genomic newborn screening programs.

Journal of Genetic CounselingVol. 34(2)
Boston University (US), Boston Medical Center (US), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), University of California San Diego (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Children's Hospital Colorado (US), Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center (US), University of Colorado Denver (US), Stanford University (US)
Greenwall Foundation, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
6.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.