Comparison of direct and indirect admission to a cardiac arrest centre for intubated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in the Northwest England: an audit

Abstract Background Despite concerted global efforts to enhance cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and post-resuscitation care, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a significant cause of mortality. Current guidelines promote the concept of Cardiac Arrest Center (CAC), offering advanced post-resuscitation management with the aim of improving survival rates. However, it remains uncertain whether directly transporting OHCA patients from the scene to these centers would enhance their prognosis. Purpose This study aimed to assess whether direct transport of intubated OHCA patients to a higher-level cardiac arrest center in the Northwest of England yielded better outcomes compared to initial resuscitation in smaller local emergency departments followed by transfer. Methods Conducted as a retrospective analysis, the audit examined OHCA patients presenting at a single cardiac arrest center between October 2018 and April 2022. Only intubated patients were included. The study compared two groups based on the route of admission: direct admission to the cardiac arrest center from the field by emergency medical service providers versus indirect admission via inter-hospital transfer to the center. The primary outcomes assessed were inpatient survival and 30-day survival. Statistical analysis employed Student's T-test and Chi-square test for clinical significance. Results The audit included 214 patients, with 112 (52.34%) in the direct group and 102 (47.66%) in the indirect group. Baseline characteristics between the groups were similar, including age, gender, downtime, bystander CPR, haemodynamic status, initial presenting rhythm (VT/VF), post-arrest ECG (STEMI), comorbidities, and procedural outcomes (Table 1). However, the direct group exhibited significantly shorter average arrival times at the cardiac arrest center (72 minutes vs. 190 minutes, p=0.017), along with improved in-hospital survival (52.68% vs. 41.18%, p=0.009) and 30-day survival rates (52.68% vs. 37.25%, p=0.002). Conclusion The direct admission of intubated OHCA patients to a cardiac arrest center, as observed in this audit, was associated with improved outcomes attributed to expedited admission times. The study’s design limitations, including its non-randomized nature and single-center approach, underscore the need for further research.