Tricuspid regurgitation in the context of severe concomitant left-sided valvular heart disease: patients characteristics and long-term clinical and interventional outcomes

Abstract Background The clinical features, therapeutical management and outcome of patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in the context of multiple valvular disease (VD) are poorly defined. Purpose To assess the characteristics, management and long-term prognosis of a large cohort of patients with multiple VD, focusing on the context of significant TR and concomitant severe mitral or aortic disease. Methods Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected in 1183 patients with ≥moderate TR diagnosed at our centers from January 2012 to June 2020: after propensity score matching for age to create matched cohort with < 10% of absolute difference, 975 patients were included in this study and divided in 4 groups as shown in Figure 1. Primary endpoint was all-cause death (ACD), secondary endpoint was the composite of heart failure (HF) hospitalization+any valvular intervention. Results Patients with isolated TR (356, 37%) had more history of atrial fibrillation and were more often asymptomatic and with preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). TR+ severe MR patients (466, 48%) showed higher rates of concomitant coronary artery disease, NYHA class III/IV symptoms and larger left atrial volumes. The group of TR+ severe AS (131 patients, 13%) was characterized by older age, more comorbidities and lower LVEF. Patients with TR and severe AR (22, 2%) were younger, with larger LV dimensions and higher pulmonary pressures. Overall, in 37(4%) patients tricuspid intervention was performed: no differences were found between groups in term of frequency of concomitant or staged tricuspid valve surgical treatment (p=0.444 and p= 0.624, respectively), while left-valve only surgical treatment was more common among patients with TR and severe MR and left-valve transcatheter treatment among patients with TR and severe AS (both p<0.001). After a median follow-up of 2.8 years, the primary endpoint occured in 374 (38%) of patients, and was significantly more frequent in the group of patients with TR and severe AS (p<0.001, Figure 2). In this group, after multivariate analysis, indexed stroke volume remained independenty associated with ACD (OR 0.96, CI 0.93-0.98, p =0.040). Eventually, the secondary endpoint too was more common in patients with TR and severe AS (p<0.001, Figure 2). Conclusions In the context of significant TR, concomitant severe left-sided VD is common, and each subtype presents with different clinical features and echocardiographic phenotypes; in this scenario, TR was profoundly underteated. Long-term, patients with significant TR+ severe AS have considerable worse prognosis.Figure 1Figure 2