Composition of non-HDL cholesterol and residual cardiovascular risk in secondary prevention

Abstract Background Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and is a recommended secondary prevention treatment target. However, the composition of non-HDL-C, that is, the relative contribution of remnant cholesterol (remnant-C) and low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), is not considered for cardiovascular risk prediction. Purpose To examine ASCVD risk by composition of non-HDL-C. Methods Based on the Western Denmark Heart Registry, we established a cohort of patients with ischemic heart disease, including patients with acute coronary syndrome or stable angina pectoris, undergoing coronary angiography for evaluation of coronary artery disease between 2011 and 2020. A complete lipid panel within 1 year after coronary angiography on statin treatment was required. Patients with triglycerides >4.5 mmol/L were excluded. Exposures were remnant-C, LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and composition of non-HDL-C. The latter was defined as remnant-C of non-HDL-C, and LDL-C of non-HDL-C, in percentages. Cox regression analyses obtained adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for myocardial infarction, ASCVD (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular death), and all-cause death occurring from 1 year after coronary angiography to end of follow-up November 1, 2022. Results The secondary prevention cohort included 42,341 statin-treated patients (67.7% were men; median [IQR] age 66 [58-73] years). During median 4.1 years of follow-up, 3,846 patients developed ASCVD. Per 1 mmol/L increase in remnant-C, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C, the aHR for ASCVD was 1.41 (95% CI 1.28-1.55), 1.12 (95% CI 1.08-1.17), and 1.17 (95% CI 1.13-1.21), respectively (Figure 1). The relative contribution of remnant-C and LDL-C was median (IQR) 24.6% (18.5-33.1) and 75.4% (66.9-81.5) of non-HDL-C, respectively. When remnant-C constituted a larger percentage of non-HDL-C (and LDL-C a lower percentage), the aHR for ASCVD showed a linear increase in risk whereas the opposite trend was observed for LDL-C (Figure 2). Thus, per 10% increase in remnant-C of non-HDL-C, the aHR of ASCVD was 1.06 (95% CI 1.03-1.09) compared to 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.97) per 10% increase in LDL-C of non-HDL-C. Results were comparable for myocardial infarction and all-cause death, and by age, sex, and other clinically relevant subgroups. Conclusions The composition of non-HDL-C is strongly associated with ASCVD risk, with the risk escalating as remnant-C constitutes a larger percentage, and LDL-C a smaller percentage, of non-HDL-C. These findings challenge current guidelines and demonstrate the value of considering composition of non-HDL-C in clinical practice for more accurate risk assessment.Figure 1Figure 2

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2779
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Composition of non-HDL cholesterol and residual cardiovascular risk in secondary prevention

Pernille Gro Thrane, Christine Gyldenkerne, Michael Mæng, Mads Hald Andersen et al.
European Heart Journal
Nutritional Studies and Diet
article

Composition of non-HDL cholesterol and residual cardiovascular risk in secondary prevention

Pernille Gro Thrane, Christine Gyldenkerne, Michael Mæng, Mads Hald Andersen, Kevin Kris Warnakula Olesen, Martin Bødtker Mortensen, N Stoedkilde-Joergensen, Magne Kjerulf Hansen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and is a recommended secondary prevention treatment target. However, the composition of non-HDL-C, that is, the relative contribution of remnant cholesterol (remnant-C) and low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), is not considered for cardiovascular risk prediction. Purpose To examine ASCVD risk by composition of non-HDL-C. Methods Based on the Western Denmark Heart Registry, we established a cohort of patients with ischemic heart disease, including patients with acute coronary syndrome or stable angina pectoris, undergoing coronary angiography for evaluation of coronary artery disease between 2011 and 2020. A complete lipid panel within 1 year after coronary angiography on statin treatment was required. Patients with triglycerides >4.5 mmol/L were excluded. Exposures were remnant-C, LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and composition of non-HDL-C. The latter was defined as remnant-C of non-HDL-C, and LDL-C of non-HDL-C, in percentages. Cox regression analyses obtained adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for myocardial infarction, ASCVD (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular death), and all-cause death occurring from 1 year after coronary angiography to end of follow-up November 1, 2022. Results The secondary prevention cohort included 42,341 statin-treated patients (67.7% were men; median [IQR] age 66 [58-73] years). During median 4.1 years of follow-up, 3,846 patients developed ASCVD. Per 1 mmol/L increase in remnant-C, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C, the aHR for ASCVD was 1.41 (95% CI 1.28-1.55), 1.12 (95% CI 1.08-1.17), and 1.17 (95% CI 1.13-1.21), respectively (Figure 1). The relative contribution of remnant-C and LDL-C was median (IQR) 24.6% (18.5-33.1) and 75.4% (66.9-81.5) of non-HDL-C, respectively. When remnant-C constituted a larger percentage of non-HDL-C (and LDL-C a lower percentage), the aHR for ASCVD showed a linear increase in risk whereas the opposite trend was observed for LDL-C (Figure 2). Thus, per 10% increase in remnant-C of non-HDL-C, the aHR of ASCVD was 1.06 (95% CI 1.03-1.09) compared to 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.97) per 10% increase in LDL-C of non-HDL-C. Results were comparable for myocardial infarction and all-cause death, and by age, sex, and other clinically relevant subgroups. Conclusions The composition of non-HDL-C is strongly associated with ASCVD risk, with the risk escalating as remnant-C constitutes a larger percentage, and LDL-C a smaller percentage, of non-HDL-C. These findings challenge current guidelines and demonstrate the value of considering composition of non-HDL-C in clinical practice for more accurate risk assessment.Figure 1Figure 2

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.