Flow adjusted predicted prosthesis patient mismatch in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Abstract Background Effective orifice area (EOA) is flow dependent. However, established methods for the assessment of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) do not consider flow status, and therefore may underestimate the rate and impact of PPM in patients with abnormal flow status. Objectives To investigate the clinical impact of flow-adjusted predicted PPM in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods Patients undergoing TAVI in a prospective TAVI registry were stratified by the presence of moderate or severe PPM (EOA index to body surface area [EOAi]: 0.65-0.85 or ≤0.65 and 0.55-0.70 or ≤0.55 cm2/m2 if obese). PPM was defined according to echocardiographically measured EOAi (measured PPM) or unadjusted or flow-adjusted predicted EOAi. Predicted EOAs were based on reference values of EOA for each valve generation and size (predicted PPMTHV) or native aortic annulus dimension (predicted PPMCT). Results Among 1,510 patients included (August 2007-June 2022), rates of moderate or severe PPM differed according to method of assessment; 27.0% and 8.7% according to measured PPM, 11.3% and 1.2% according to predicted PPMTHV, 12.0% and 0.1% according to PPMCT, 21.6% and 0.2% according to flow-adjusted predicted PPMTHV, and 25.1% and 0.4% according to flow-adjusted predicted PPMCT. Five-year mortality was comparable in patients with and without flow-adjusted predicted PPM defined by either method. These results were consistent when patients were stratified by flow status. Conclusions Rates of PPM differ considerably when flow status is considered. There was no consistent signal of increased risk of adverse events up to 5 years in patients with flow-adjusted predicted PPM.Frequency of PPM afteer TAVICumulative event curves for death