How vaccination affects clinical outcomes of COVID-19 positive revascularized patients?

Abstract Background/Introduction Several vaccines are now available under emergency use authorization in globe and have demonstrated efficacy against COVID-19 positive patients. Our investigation centers on understanding the correlation between COVID-19 vaccine status and an extensive spectrum of risk factors, clarifying their impact on clinical outcomes in COVID-positive revascularized populations. Purpose This study clarified the multifaceted impact of the COVID-19 vaccine on individuals with a history of revascularization, highlighting the relationship between vaccination status and clinical outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective a cohort study COVID-19 positive (n=620) patients with revascularized two years prior to the pandemic, was categorized into unvaccinated (n=359) and vaccinated (n=261) groups. Comprehensive retrospective data on various risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes, smoking, stroke history, family history were collected. Clinical outcomes, intently documented, encompassed hospitalization, mortality, stroke and mechanical ventilation. Statistical analyses, including correlation assessments, were conducted, focusing on the COVID-positive subgroup. Results During the analysis of risk factors, between the unvaccinated and vaccinated groups the prevalence of smoking (32% vs. 31.4%, p=0.871), hypertension (81.3% vs. 78.2%, p=0.329), DM (42 .9% vs. 43.3%, p=0.921), HLP (14.8% vs. 13%, p=0.539), family history (21.7% vs. 17.6%, p=0.208)were not significantly different (Table 1). It showed a significant association with increased hospitalization(14.6% vs. 24.8%, p = 0.002) and death (2.3% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.002)rates in the unvaccinated group. In addition, it was associated with higher rate of mechanical ventilation in the unvaccinated group (2.6% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.153).Also, no significant difference was found between the two groups according to the type of revascularization, PCI (70.2% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.179), CABG (29.8% vs. 24.9%, p = 0.179) (Table 2). Conclusion(s) Our analysis within the COVID-positive subgroup of 620 revascularized patients revealed a significant correlation between COVID-19 vaccination status and clinical outcomes. Thus, a significant reduction in hospitalizations and deaths was recorded in the vaccinated group. This supports a potential positive effect of the vaccine on cardiovascular events in patients with COVID-19.Table 1Table 2

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2793
Primary Topic
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How vaccination affects clinical outcomes of COVID-19 positive revascularized patients?

Oktay Musayev, Firdovsi İbrahimov, Gulnaz Dadashova, F Aliyeva et al.
European Heart Journal
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
article

How vaccination affects clinical outcomes of COVID-19 positive revascularized patients?

Oktay Musayev, Firdovsi İbrahimov, Gulnaz Dadashova, F Aliyeva, Shafa Shahbazova, R Dashdemirov, Z Alimli, N Mushtagzadeh, S Gasimzade
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background/Introduction Several vaccines are now available under emergency use authorization in globe and have demonstrated efficacy against COVID-19 positive patients. Our investigation centers on understanding the correlation between COVID-19 vaccine status and an extensive spectrum of risk factors, clarifying their impact on clinical outcomes in COVID-positive revascularized populations. Purpose This study clarified the multifaceted impact of the COVID-19 vaccine on individuals with a history of revascularization, highlighting the relationship between vaccination status and clinical outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective a cohort study COVID-19 positive (n=620) patients with revascularized two years prior to the pandemic, was categorized into unvaccinated (n=359) and vaccinated (n=261) groups. Comprehensive retrospective data on various risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes, smoking, stroke history, family history were collected. Clinical outcomes, intently documented, encompassed hospitalization, mortality, stroke and mechanical ventilation. Statistical analyses, including correlation assessments, were conducted, focusing on the COVID-positive subgroup. Results During the analysis of risk factors, between the unvaccinated and vaccinated groups the prevalence of smoking (32% vs. 31.4%, p=0.871), hypertension (81.3% vs. 78.2%, p=0.329), DM (42 .9% vs. 43.3%, p=0.921), HLP (14.8% vs. 13%, p=0.539), family history (21.7% vs. 17.6%, p=0.208)were not significantly different (Table 1). It showed a significant association with increased hospitalization(14.6% vs. 24.8%, p = 0.002) and death (2.3% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.002)rates in the unvaccinated group. In addition, it was associated with higher rate of mechanical ventilation in the unvaccinated group (2.6% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.153).Also, no significant difference was found between the two groups according to the type of revascularization, PCI (70.2% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.179), CABG (29.8% vs. 24.9%, p = 0.179) (Table 2). Conclusion(s) Our analysis within the COVID-positive subgroup of 620 revascularized patients revealed a significant correlation between COVID-19 vaccination status and clinical outcomes. Thus, a significant reduction in hospitalizations and deaths was recorded in the vaccinated group. This supports a potential positive effect of the vaccine on cardiovascular events in patients with COVID-19.Table 1Table 2

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Institute of Cardiology (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.