Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Medial Meniscal Lesions in Cranial Cruciate-Deficient Stifle Joints in Dogs
Background: The aim of this study was to substantiate the ability of noninvasive low-field magnetic resonance imaging (lfMRI) to accurately depict meniscal lesions, thereby establishing lfMRI as a viable option for the diagnosis of meniscal pathology. Study Design: This was a prospective, controlled study. Materials and Methods: In each of 57 stifle joints, 5 predefined lfMRI sequences using a 0.25 T lfMRI were used. The scans were evaluated by an experienced surgeon (DECVS) and through external assessment by a radiologist (DECVDI). The patients were divided into two groups depending on their meniscal status after lfMRI. Dogs (Group 1; n = 33) without lfMRI evidence of medial meniscal pathology underwent TPLO, whereas concurrent craniomedial mini-arthrotomy was performed in patients with suspected meniscal lesions (Group 2; n = 24). Gait assessment was performed 6 weeks later and 6 months postoperatively. Results: Cohen’s kappa value of 0.8571 corresponds to a high level of agreement between the observers. A significant correlation was found between preoperative lameness severity and intraoperative meniscal damage (p < 0.04). The results showed a highly significant correlation between meniscal injuries on MRI and intraoperative findings (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: LfMRI appears to be a noninvasive, reliable imaging tool for the detection of medial meniscal lesions in cranial cruciate-deficient stifle joints, aiming to avoid (minimally) invasive diagnostics in healthy menisci.
Authors
- Martin Konar
- J Knebel
- A Klatt
- Stephan Neumann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8392-0093)
- S. Wilke
- Henning Schenk
Institutions
- Klinikum Lüneburg (DE)
- University of Göttingen (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Animals
- Published
- 2024-10-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14213097
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.64