Prognostic impact of left ventricular ejection fraction improvement after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Abstract Introduction Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an efficient and save alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). While severe aortic stenosis as well as severe aortic regurgitation (AR) is known to negatively impact left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), prior studies have shown that TAVR can lead to improvement in LVEF. So far, little is known about the prognostic implication of LVEF-improvement as a sole predictor of outcomes. Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of early LVEF improvement in patients undergoing TAVR. Materials and Methods Patients undergoing TAVR in a large tertiary university hospital have been consecutively included in a large prospective registry. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed at baseline, after TAVR before discharge, at 1 month and annually thereafter. Significant LVEF improvement was defined as >10% relative increase of LVEF at 30 days compared to baseline LVEF. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 5 years. Secondary outcome were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, bleeding and unplanned re-interventions of the aortic valve. Results Among 1481 patients undergoing TAVR between September 2011 and June 2023, LVEF at baseline and at 30 days was available in 1013 patients. 665 patients (65.6%) had normal LVEF at baseline, whereas 348 patients (34.4%) had a reduced LVEF. Of these, 137 patients (13.5%) showed significant improvement of LVEF ≥10%) after 30 days, while 266 patients (26.3%) showed no significant LVEF-improvement (<10%). The combined patients with persevered LVEF at baseline had significantly better outcomes than those with impaired EF (p=<0.001). LVEF improvement was not associated with mortality at 5 years (p= 0.51), however with lower MACE rate at 5 years (p=0,024). Conclusion Normal LVEF before TAVR is an independent predictor for improved outcomes. In addition, early improvement of LVEF is associated with beneficial outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR.Course of LVEF after TAVROutcomes after TAVR

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2445
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic impact of left ventricular ejection fraction improvement after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Gregor Leibundgut, Thorald Stolte, J. R. Reichl, Thomas Nestelberger et al.
European Heart Journal
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Prognostic impact of left ventricular ejection fraction improvement after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Gregor Leibundgut, Thorald Stolte, J. R. Reichl, Thomas Nestelberger, Jasper Boeddinghaus, Anna Pfenniger, Christoph Kaiser
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an efficient and save alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). While severe aortic stenosis as well as severe aortic regurgitation (AR) is known to negatively impact left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), prior studies have shown that TAVR can lead to improvement in LVEF. So far, little is known about the prognostic implication of LVEF-improvement as a sole predictor of outcomes. Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of early LVEF improvement in patients undergoing TAVR. Materials and Methods Patients undergoing TAVR in a large tertiary university hospital have been consecutively included in a large prospective registry. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed at baseline, after TAVR before discharge, at 1 month and annually thereafter. Significant LVEF improvement was defined as >10% relative increase of LVEF at 30 days compared to baseline LVEF. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 5 years. Secondary outcome were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, bleeding and unplanned re-interventions of the aortic valve. Results Among 1481 patients undergoing TAVR between September 2011 and June 2023, LVEF at baseline and at 30 days was available in 1013 patients. 665 patients (65.6%) had normal LVEF at baseline, whereas 348 patients (34.4%) had a reduced LVEF. Of these, 137 patients (13.5%) showed significant improvement of LVEF ≥10%) after 30 days, while 266 patients (26.3%) showed no significant LVEF-improvement (<10%). The combined patients with persevered LVEF at baseline had significantly better outcomes than those with impaired EF (p=<0.001). LVEF improvement was not associated with mortality at 5 years (p= 0.51), however with lower MACE rate at 5 years (p=0,024). Conclusion Normal LVEF before TAVR is an independent predictor for improved outcomes. In addition, early improvement of LVEF is associated with beneficial outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR.Course of LVEF after TAVROutcomes after TAVR

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Cardiovascular Institute Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.