Association of High-Risk Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Artificial Intelligence-Guided, CT-Based Severity Scores in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia

<b>Background:</b> We have previously demonstrated that high-risk obstructive sleep apnea (HR-OSA), based on a modified Berlin Questionnaire (mBQ), is linked to worse clinical outcomes. Chest computed tomography (CT) imaging with the implementation of an artificial intelligence (AI) analysis program has been a valuable tool for the speedy assessment of huge numbers of patients during the COVID-19 epidemic. In the current study, we addressed how the severity of AI-guided, CT-based total opacity ratio (TOR) scores are associated with high-risk OSA and short-term outcomes in the same cohort. <b>Methods:</b> The ratio of the volume of high opacity areas to that of the total lung volume constituted the TOR. We arbitrarily applied thresholds of <5 (no or mild TOR), ≥5 and <15 (moderate TOR), and ≥15 (severe TOR). <b>Results:</b> In total, 221 patients were included. HR-OSA was observed among 11.0% of the no or mild TOR group, 22.2% of the moderate TOR group, and 38.7% of the severe TOR group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In a logistic regression analysis, HR-OSA was associated with a severe TOR with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-7.44; <i>p</i> = 0.01). A moderate TOR predicted clinical worsening with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.93 (95% CI 1.00-3.72; <i>p</i> = 0.05) and a severe TOR predicted worsening with an HR of 3.06 (95% CI 1.56-5.99; <i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our results offer additional radiological proof of the relationship between HR-OSA and worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. A TOR may also potentially indicate the individuals that are at higher risk of HR-OSA, enabling early intervention and management strategies. The clinical significance of TOR thresholds needs further evaluation in larger samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216415
Citations
1
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of High-Risk Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Artificial Intelligence-Guided, CT-Based Severity Scores in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia

Zeynep Atçeken, Yeliz Çelik, Çetin Atasoy, Yüksel Peker
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
0.39
article

Association of High-Risk Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Artificial Intelligence-Guided, CT-Based Severity Scores in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia

Zeynep Atçeken, Yeliz Çelik, Çetin Atasoy, Yüksel Peker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> We have previously demonstrated that high-risk obstructive sleep apnea (HR-OSA), based on a modified Berlin Questionnaire (mBQ), is linked to worse clinical outcomes. Chest computed tomography (CT) imaging with the implementation of an artificial intelligence (AI) analysis program has been a valuable tool for the speedy assessment of huge numbers of patients during the COVID-19 epidemic. In the current study, we addressed how the severity of AI-guided, CT-based total opacity ratio (TOR) scores are associated with high-risk OSA and short-term outcomes in the same cohort. <b>Methods:</b> The ratio of the volume of high opacity areas to that of the total lung volume constituted the TOR. We arbitrarily applied thresholds of <5 (no or mild TOR), ≥5 and <15 (moderate TOR), and ≥15 (severe TOR). <b>Results:</b> In total, 221 patients were included. HR-OSA was observed among 11.0% of the no or mild TOR group, 22.2% of the moderate TOR group, and 38.7% of the severe TOR group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In a logistic regression analysis, HR-OSA was associated with a severe TOR with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-7.44; <i>p</i> = 0.01). A moderate TOR predicted clinical worsening with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.93 (95% CI 1.00-3.72; <i>p</i> = 0.05) and a severe TOR predicted worsening with an HR of 3.06 (95% CI 1.56-5.99; <i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our results offer additional radiological proof of the relationship between HR-OSA and worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. A TOR may also potentially indicate the individuals that are at higher risk of HR-OSA, enabling early intervention and management strategies. The clinical significance of TOR thresholds needs further evaluation in larger samples.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(21)
Koç University (TR), University of Pittsburgh (US), Lund University (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
ResMed Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.