Tracking Public Interest Through Google Trends: Comparative Analysis of Global Movements

This paper examined the digital dynamics of three significant social justice movements: Black Lives Matter (2020), South African unrest (2021), and Mahsa Amini protests (2022) through the lens of Google Trends analysis. By tracking search interest patterns during key events, the study explored how each movement gained momentum and sustained visibility online. The analysis revealed distinct public engagement patterns for each movement: The Black Lives Matter movement experienced global peaks in search interest, with sustained attention driven by discussions on police reform and racial justice. The South African unrest saw sharp, localized spikes in search activity, particularly during moments of heightened tension such as the looting incidents and the government’s deployment of the military. The Mahsa Amini protests demonstrated sustained, high-level interest globally, with search trends reflecting the growing international focus on human rights and state repression in Iran. The findings highlighted how search engines like Google played a pivotal role in amplifying these movements, documenting societal reactions, and shaping the global public discourse. This study underscored the power of digital platforms to reflect and influence the trajectory of social movements across different political and cultural contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computers and Digital Business
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56427/jcbd.v3i3.597
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracking Public Interest Through Google Trends: Comparative Analysis of Global Movements

R. M. Kapila Tharanga Rathnayaka, Amila Chethana Nanayakkara, Banage T. G. S. Kumara
Journal of Computers and Digital Business
Media Studies and Communication
article

Tracking Public Interest Through Google Trends: Comparative Analysis of Global Movements

R. M. Kapila Tharanga Rathnayaka, Amila Chethana Nanayakkara, Banage T. G. S. Kumara
article en

Abstract

This paper examined the digital dynamics of three significant social justice movements: Black Lives Matter (2020), South African unrest (2021), and Mahsa Amini protests (2022) through the lens of Google Trends analysis. By tracking search interest patterns during key events, the study explored how each movement gained momentum and sustained visibility online. The analysis revealed distinct public engagement patterns for each movement: The Black Lives Matter movement experienced global peaks in search interest, with sustained attention driven by discussions on police reform and racial justice. The South African unrest saw sharp, localized spikes in search activity, particularly during moments of heightened tension such as the looting incidents and the government’s deployment of the military. The Mahsa Amini protests demonstrated sustained, high-level interest globally, with search trends reflecting the growing international focus on human rights and state repression in Iran. The findings highlighted how search engines like Google played a pivotal role in amplifying these movements, documenting societal reactions, and shaping the global public discourse. This study underscored the power of digital platforms to reflect and influence the trajectory of social movements across different political and cultural contexts.

Journal of Computers and Digital BusinessVol. 3(3)
Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka (LK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.