Alfacalcidol vs. Calcitriol in the Management of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in CKD

Background: This study aims to assess the efficacy of alfacalcidol compared to calcitriol in reducing iPTH levels in patients with chronic kidney disease Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at our quaternary care hospital between January 1st, 2022, and December 31st, 2022. Adult Patients diagnosed with CKD stage 3 to 5 (not on dialysis) who received alfacalcidol for at least 3 months followed by calcitriol for another 3 months were included. Laboratory values were assessed at baseline, at 3 months while on alfacalcidol then at 3 months while on calcitriol. The primary outcome was the suppression of the iPTH , while the secondary outcome was the effect on total serum calcium. The study was approved by the hospital’s research ethics committee Results: Seventy adult patients were included in the analysis. Statistical analysis was conducted using Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemer test. CKD stage 3 comprised 47.1% of the sample while stage 4 comprised 37.1%. The median dose of alfacalcidol was 0.5 (0.25-0.8) mcg, compared to 0.5 (0.25-0.5) mcg for calcitriol (p= 0.001). The median time between baseline and outcome laboratory measurements was 94 (83-106) days for alfacalcidol and 94 (78.5-110.5) for calcitriol (p= 0.676). No significant differences were observed in the use of phosphate binders or non-active vitamin D between the time periods. Alfacalcidol did not significantly suppress the iPTH levels with median values of 13.31 (8.23 - 24.4) pg/mL at baseline and 12.5 (8.86 - 24.7) pg/mL after 3 months (p= 0.937). In contrast, calcitriol significantly reduced the iPTH levels from 12.5 (8.86 - 24.7) pg/mL to 10.7 (5.7 -19) pg/mL (p= 0.017). Additionally, alfacalcidol did not significantly increase calcium levels, with values of 2.29 (2.2 - 2.3) mmol/L at baseline and 2.3 (2.23 - 2.36) mmol/L after 3 months (p=0.237), whereas calcitriol significantly increased calcium levels from 2.3 (2.23 - 2.36) mmol/L to 2.34 (2.27 - 2.43) mmol/L (p=0.001). Albumin values remained unchanged throughout the study period Conclusion: Calcitriol, at significantly lower doses, was more effective than alfacalcidol in reducing iPTH levels and increasing calcium levels over 3 months. Larger prospective controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2024d5ardtgp
Primary Topic
Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alfacalcidol vs. Calcitriol in the Management of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in CKD

Wasim S. El Nekidy, Jihad Mallat, Muriel Ghosn, Anam Malik et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
article

Alfacalcidol vs. Calcitriol in the Management of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in CKD

Wasim S. El Nekidy, Jihad Mallat, Muriel Ghosn, Anam Malik, Emna Abidi, Iyad Ghazal, Rakesh Madhyastha, Fadi A. Hijazi
article en

Abstract

Background: This study aims to assess the efficacy of alfacalcidol compared to calcitriol in reducing iPTH levels in patients with chronic kidney disease Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at our quaternary care hospital between January 1st, 2022, and December 31st, 2022. Adult Patients diagnosed with CKD stage 3 to 5 (not on dialysis) who received alfacalcidol for at least 3 months followed by calcitriol for another 3 months were included. Laboratory values were assessed at baseline, at 3 months while on alfacalcidol then at 3 months while on calcitriol. The primary outcome was the suppression of the iPTH , while the secondary outcome was the effect on total serum calcium. The study was approved by the hospital’s research ethics committee Results: Seventy adult patients were included in the analysis. Statistical analysis was conducted using Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemer test. CKD stage 3 comprised 47.1% of the sample while stage 4 comprised 37.1%. The median dose of alfacalcidol was 0.5 (0.25-0.8) mcg, compared to 0.5 (0.25-0.5) mcg for calcitriol (p= 0.001). The median time between baseline and outcome laboratory measurements was 94 (83-106) days for alfacalcidol and 94 (78.5-110.5) for calcitriol (p= 0.676). No significant differences were observed in the use of phosphate binders or non-active vitamin D between the time periods. Alfacalcidol did not significantly suppress the iPTH levels with median values of 13.31 (8.23 - 24.4) pg/mL at baseline and 12.5 (8.86 - 24.7) pg/mL after 3 months (p= 0.937). In contrast, calcitriol significantly reduced the iPTH levels from 12.5 (8.86 - 24.7) pg/mL to 10.7 (5.7 -19) pg/mL (p= 0.017). Additionally, alfacalcidol did not significantly increase calcium levels, with values of 2.29 (2.2 - 2.3) mmol/L at baseline and 2.3 (2.23 - 2.36) mmol/L after 3 months (p=0.237), whereas calcitriol significantly increased calcium levels from 2.3 (2.23 - 2.36) mmol/L to 2.34 (2.27 - 2.43) mmol/L (p=0.001). Albumin values remained unchanged throughout the study period Conclusion: Calcitriol, at significantly lower doses, was more effective than alfacalcidol in reducing iPTH levels and increasing calcium levels over 3 months. Larger prospective controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Emirates Foundation (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.