Strengthening urban deer management with structured decision making

Urban deer management (UDM) decision‐makers face social, ecological, regulatory, and economic pressures when creating an agreeable deer management plan for stakeholders. Historically, decision making techniques (e.g. consensus‐based analyses) have not effectively balanced UDM elements leading to short‐lived management progress. Structured decision making (SDM) is a formal, values‐based approach to identifying an optimal management solution. Although SDM has been applied to other wildlife management decisions, it has not been applied in UDM. We provide the first case‐study of SDM‐based UDM and streamline the process for wildlife managers. We focused on one suburban and one semi‐rural community near Atlanta, Georgia, USA. We established a problem statement to capture what decision‐makers must address in UDM programs and reviewed the primary literature and UDM plans from five states to establish four fundamental objectives. We then utilized a support–effectiveness analysis to identify acceptable UDM alternatives and gathered expert insights to calculate the consequences of alternatives on objectives. Finally, we asked each community's decision‐makers to weigh objectives against each other. Using this framework, education was the most optimal UDM technique to implement in the suburban community, and sharpshooting was the most optimal UDM technique to implement in the semi‐rural community. This paper positions SDM as a transparent, defensible, inclusive, and adaptive approach to UDM. Furthermore, our SDM framework provides managers with the means and justification to create an optimal plan of action for communities in need of UDM.