Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Use in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Study

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have radically improved cancer outcomes. Due to concerns regarding graft rejection, ICI's were infrequently offered to KTR's despite significant cancer related mortality. We report the cancer and allograft outcomes of patients receiving ICI therapy at our center. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all KTR's undergoing ICI therapy at our center that were referred to our transplant clinic for immunosuppression (IS) management from December 1, 2018 to May 1, 2024. All patients continue to be followed, unless deceased. Indication biopsies were performed for acute kidney injuries. Results: 21 patients met inclusion criteria. Patient characteristics and outcomes are described in Table 1. No acute rejection was noted. 1 patient had biopsy evidence of chronic antibody mediated rejection and recurrent PLA2R positive membranous nephropathy after 11 months of Pembrolizumab. This patient had a complete response with a stable creatinine of 1.5-1.8 mg/dL 2 years post therapy completion. Of 16 evaluable patients, 1 had complete response, 3 had partial response, and 2 had stable disease. Therapy limiting extra-renal immune related adverse events were noted in 1 patient with colitis. Conclusion: The absence of acute rejection or frequently recurrent native disease in our cohort is encouraging, though objective response is low. Many patients were frail with advanced disease at the time of ICI initiation, likely contributing to the poor objective response, though degree and type of IS may also have influenced outcomes. Additional prospective studies comparing IS regimens while controlling for disease burden are needed. Table 1 - Total Patients (n=21) Median Age at ICI Therapy Initiation (years) 65 (range 52-78) ESRD Secondary to Glomerulopathy (%) 43 Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (%) 57 Metastatic Melanoma (%) 19 Patients on PD1 Inhibitor (%) 95 Maintenance Post ICI (Calcineurin Inhibitor/Pred) (%) 67 Maintenance Post ICI (Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor/Pred) (%) 28 Rejection (%) 4.8 Median Follow Up (months) 3 (range 0.25 - 44) Objective Response in 16 evaluable patients (%) 25 Stable Disease in 16 Evaluable Patients (%) 12.5 Median Overall Survival For Patients with Progressive Disease (months) 3 (range 0.25-8) Median Time from Transplant to ICI Initiation (years) 8 (range 1-29)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2024sxma4jpz
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Use in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Study

Clark C. Otley, Ali Ghaffar, Elena-Bianca Barbir, Aleksandra Kukla et al.
2 citations
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
1.02
article

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Use in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Study

Clark C. Otley, Ali Ghaffar, Elena-Bianca Barbir, Aleksandra Kukla, Arkadiusz Z. Dudek
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have radically improved cancer outcomes. Due to concerns regarding graft rejection, ICI's were infrequently offered to KTR's despite significant cancer related mortality. We report the cancer and allograft outcomes of patients receiving ICI therapy at our center. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all KTR's undergoing ICI therapy at our center that were referred to our transplant clinic for immunosuppression (IS) management from December 1, 2018 to May 1, 2024. All patients continue to be followed, unless deceased. Indication biopsies were performed for acute kidney injuries. Results: 21 patients met inclusion criteria. Patient characteristics and outcomes are described in Table 1. No acute rejection was noted. 1 patient had biopsy evidence of chronic antibody mediated rejection and recurrent PLA2R positive membranous nephropathy after 11 months of Pembrolizumab. This patient had a complete response with a stable creatinine of 1.5-1.8 mg/dL 2 years post therapy completion. Of 16 evaluable patients, 1 had complete response, 3 had partial response, and 2 had stable disease. Therapy limiting extra-renal immune related adverse events were noted in 1 patient with colitis. Conclusion: The absence of acute rejection or frequently recurrent native disease in our cohort is encouraging, though objective response is low. Many patients were frail with advanced disease at the time of ICI initiation, likely contributing to the poor objective response, though degree and type of IS may also have influenced outcomes. Additional prospective studies comparing IS regimens while controlling for disease burden are needed. Table 1 - Total Patients (n=21) Median Age at ICI Therapy Initiation (years) 65 (range 52-78) ESRD Secondary to Glomerulopathy (%) 43 Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (%) 57 Metastatic Melanoma (%) 19 Patients on PD1 Inhibitor (%) 95 Maintenance Post ICI (Calcineurin Inhibitor/Pred) (%) 67 Maintenance Post ICI (Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor/Pred) (%) 28 Rejection (%) 4.8 Median Follow Up (months) 3 (range 0.25 - 44) Objective Response in 16 evaluable patients (%) 25 Stable Disease in 16 Evaluable Patients (%) 12.5 Median Overall Survival For Patients with Progressive Disease (months) 3 (range 0.25-8) Median Time from Transplant to ICI Initiation (years) 8 (range 1-29)

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Mayo Clinic (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
1.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.