Cumulative Detrimental Effect of Hypotension during Intermittent Hemodialysis on Kidney Recovery in Critically Ill Patients with AKI Requiring Dialysis

Background: Acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (AKI-D) severely affects the mortality and kidney outcomes of critically ill patients. Intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) is commonly implemented throughout the entire period of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in AKI-D patients, irrespective of initial modality of KRT. There remain concerns about hemodynamic instability during IHD, but the impact of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) during IHD on kidney recovery remains undetermined. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled individuals who were diagnosed with AKI and received IHD at intensive care units of Inha University from January 2018 to February 2024. IDH was defined as having a nadir systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, newly starting vasopressors or increasing the dose during IHD sessions, or early termination of dialysis due to hemodynamic instability. We ascertained IDH occurrences and dialysis dependence at discharge in survivors from AKI-D. Results: Of a total of 1,473 patients received kidney replacement therapy due to AKI, 765 patients died, and 276 patients did not undergo IHD. Therefore, 172 patients receiving IHD were included in the main analysis. Median number of IHD sessions were 7.0 (IQR 3-11.5), and the proportion of IDH per patient was approximately 14%. Of these, 67 patients (45.9%) were dialysis-dependent at discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed the number of IHD (as a continuous variable) was a significant predictor for dialysis dependence (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.17-2.64). When the number of IHD was categorized (0, 1-2, and ≥3), the risk of dialysis dependence was substantially higher for individuals with the number of IDH ≥3 compared to those without IDH (OR, 10.41; 95% CI, 2.22-58.93). In the per-session analysis, target UFR was the independent risk factor for IDH occurrence. Conclusion: Our study revealed that IHD-related hypotension during hospitalization has the cumulative adverse impact on kidney recovery in AKI-D survivors. To improve kidney outcomes following AKI-D, the prevention for hemodynamic instability during IHD might be crucial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.20242q34an2h
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cumulative Detrimental Effect of Hypotension during Intermittent Hemodialysis on Kidney Recovery in Critically Ill Patients with AKI Requiring Dialysis

Jae-ryang Yoon, Kipyo Kim
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Cumulative Detrimental Effect of Hypotension during Intermittent Hemodialysis on Kidney Recovery in Critically Ill Patients with AKI Requiring Dialysis

Jae-ryang Yoon, Kipyo Kim
article en

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (AKI-D) severely affects the mortality and kidney outcomes of critically ill patients. Intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) is commonly implemented throughout the entire period of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in AKI-D patients, irrespective of initial modality of KRT. There remain concerns about hemodynamic instability during IHD, but the impact of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) during IHD on kidney recovery remains undetermined. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled individuals who were diagnosed with AKI and received IHD at intensive care units of Inha University from January 2018 to February 2024. IDH was defined as having a nadir systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, newly starting vasopressors or increasing the dose during IHD sessions, or early termination of dialysis due to hemodynamic instability. We ascertained IDH occurrences and dialysis dependence at discharge in survivors from AKI-D. Results: Of a total of 1,473 patients received kidney replacement therapy due to AKI, 765 patients died, and 276 patients did not undergo IHD. Therefore, 172 patients receiving IHD were included in the main analysis. Median number of IHD sessions were 7.0 (IQR 3-11.5), and the proportion of IDH per patient was approximately 14%. Of these, 67 patients (45.9%) were dialysis-dependent at discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed the number of IHD (as a continuous variable) was a significant predictor for dialysis dependence (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.17-2.64). When the number of IHD was categorized (0, 1-2, and ≥3), the risk of dialysis dependence was substantially higher for individuals with the number of IDH ≥3 compared to those without IDH (OR, 10.41; 95% CI, 2.22-58.93). In the per-session analysis, target UFR was the independent risk factor for IDH occurrence. Conclusion: Our study revealed that IHD-related hypotension during hospitalization has the cumulative adverse impact on kidney recovery in AKI-D survivors. To improve kidney outcomes following AKI-D, the prevention for hemodynamic instability during IHD might be crucial.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Inha University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.