Sex Disparities in Access to Second Kidney Transplantation among Adolescents

Background: Prior work has demonstrated disparities in access to kidney transplantation by sex, with women being less likely to receive a first transplant compared to men. We aimed to determine whether this disparity persists in relation to access to second kidney transplantation. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of people ≥13 years with first graft failure from 2006-2019 according to the United States Renal Data System. Using Cox proportional hazards models, the primary predictor was sex and the primary outcome was receipt of a second transplant overall, living, or deceased donor transplantation. We tested for interaction between age at first graft failure and sex. Results: Of the 36,215 individuals included, median age at first graft failure was 48 years (IQR 37-58 years; 59% male). Median vintage of the first graft was 8 years (IQR 4-13 years), with no difference by sex (p=0.44). Over the observation period, 6,935 individuals (19%) died prior to second transplant receipt, and 18,610 individuals (51%) received a second transplant. There was an interaction between age and sex (pint<0.05) such that girls 13-<18 years at first graft failure had reduced access to second transplant as compared to same-aged boys (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.76). This relationship was not observed among older age groups. Findings were more prominent for deceased (vs living) donor transplantation in the adolescent age group. Conclusion: Adolescent girls had substantially reduced access to second transplant compared to adolescent boys, a disparity that was not observed in other age groups. Given the high priority of children on the national waitlist, further studies are needed to understanding the sources of this disparity. Funding: NIDDK Support Hazard of second kidney transplant by sex, stratified by age at first graft failure - Hazard and 95% CI for women vs. men (reference) Any transplantation Living donor transplantation Deceased donor transplantation Overall 1.02 (0.99-1.05) 1.06 (1.01-1.11) 1.00 (0.97-1.03) 13-<18 years 0.65 (0.55-0.76) 0.89 (0.64-1.24) 0.59 (0.49-0.72) 18-<40 years 1.05 (1.00-1.11) 1.05 (0.96-1.13) 1.06 (1.00-1.13) 40-<65 years 1.04 (1.00-1.08) 1.09 (1.02-1.16) 1.01 (0.97-1.06) ≥65 years 0.92 (0.83-1.00) 0.94 (0.78-1.13) 0.91 (0.81-1.02) Models adjusted for age and body mass index at first graft failure, sex, race/ethnicity, neighborhood income, calendar period (before vs. after 2014 Kidney Allocation System changes were made), insurance type, ABO blood group, and comorbidities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2024mt8d4mrn
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Disparities in Access to Second Kidney Transplantation among Adolescents

Charles E. McCulloch, Alexandra Bicki, Sang M. Nguyen, Gabriela Accetta Rojas et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

Sex Disparities in Access to Second Kidney Transplantation among Adolescents

Charles E. McCulloch, Alexandra Bicki, Sang M. Nguyen, Gabriela Accetta Rojas, Elaine Ku
article en

Abstract

Background: Prior work has demonstrated disparities in access to kidney transplantation by sex, with women being less likely to receive a first transplant compared to men. We aimed to determine whether this disparity persists in relation to access to second kidney transplantation. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of people ≥13 years with first graft failure from 2006-2019 according to the United States Renal Data System. Using Cox proportional hazards models, the primary predictor was sex and the primary outcome was receipt of a second transplant overall, living, or deceased donor transplantation. We tested for interaction between age at first graft failure and sex. Results: Of the 36,215 individuals included, median age at first graft failure was 48 years (IQR 37-58 years; 59% male). Median vintage of the first graft was 8 years (IQR 4-13 years), with no difference by sex (p=0.44). Over the observation period, 6,935 individuals (19%) died prior to second transplant receipt, and 18,610 individuals (51%) received a second transplant. There was an interaction between age and sex (pint<0.05) such that girls 13-<18 years at first graft failure had reduced access to second transplant as compared to same-aged boys (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.76). This relationship was not observed among older age groups. Findings were more prominent for deceased (vs living) donor transplantation in the adolescent age group. Conclusion: Adolescent girls had substantially reduced access to second transplant compared to adolescent boys, a disparity that was not observed in other age groups. Given the high priority of children on the national waitlist, further studies are needed to understanding the sources of this disparity. Funding: NIDDK Support Hazard of second kidney transplant by sex, stratified by age at first graft failure - Hazard and 95% CI for women vs. men (reference) Any transplantation Living donor transplantation Deceased donor transplantation Overall 1.02 (0.99-1.05) 1.06 (1.01-1.11) 1.00 (0.97-1.03) 13-<18 years 0.65 (0.55-0.76) 0.89 (0.64-1.24) 0.59 (0.49-0.72) 18-<40 years 1.05 (1.00-1.11) 1.05 (0.96-1.13) 1.06 (1.00-1.13) 40-<65 years 1.04 (1.00-1.08) 1.09 (1.02-1.16) 1.01 (0.97-1.06) ≥65 years 0.92 (0.83-1.00) 0.94 (0.78-1.13) 0.91 (0.81-1.02) Models adjusted for age and body mass index at first graft failure, sex, race/ethnicity, neighborhood income, calendar period (before vs. after 2014 Kidney Allocation System changes were made), insurance type, ABO blood group, and comorbidities.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.