Anchoring Sepsis Management: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Fluid Resuscitation in Advanced and ESRD

Background: Physicians are hesitant to give fluid boluses to renal failure patients, which is significant given the frequency end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients develop sepsis and septic shock. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the volume of fluid given for sepsis and mortality in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ESRD. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study of CKD and ESRD patients who were admitted for sepsis was conducted across 16 West Florida hospitals. Inclusion criteria was non-pregnant adult patients admitted between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022 with CKD4, CKD5 or ESRD for sepsis and having received a fluid bolus within 6 hours of admission. Patients (n=4,265) were grouped by Standard (greater than 30mL/kg), Conservative (15-30ml/kg), or Ultra-conservative (less than 15mL/kg) fluid bolus. Sub-analysis was then performed among those patients who were either oliguric (less than 0.5mL/kg/hr) or anuric (n=2,344). Inhospital mortality was the primary outcome assessed, with secondary outcomes of ICU admission, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and inpatient initiation of dialysis (IID). Results: In the Ultra-conservative group there was a reduction in odds ratio (OR) of vasopressor use (OR 0.723) and ICU admission (OR 0.484), with an increase in IID (OR 1.45) compared to Standard. No difference was seen in mortality or mechanical ventilation. In the Conservative group there was a reduction in vasopressor use (OR 0.717) and ICU admission (OR 0.67). No difference was seen in mortality, mechanical ventilation or IID. Within the oliguric and anuric subgroup, the Ultra-conservative group only had a significant reduction in Mechanical ventilation (OR 0.703) and ICU admissions (OR 0.536). Within the oliguric and anuric subgroup, the Conservative group had no difference in outcomes compared to Standard. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in mortality in either decreased volume group compared to Standard, although differences in ICU, vasopressor and dialysis use were noted. This study supports physician discretion for fluid bolus to patients who have poor renal function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2024az4q3m1k
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anchoring Sepsis Management: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Fluid Resuscitation in Advanced and ESRD

Abraheim Al-Nasseri, Ahmed Eddib, H. Lester Reed, Usman Kazi et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Anchoring Sepsis Management: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Fluid Resuscitation in Advanced and ESRD

Abraheim Al-Nasseri, Ahmed Eddib, H. Lester Reed, Usman Kazi, Adam Michael Robarge
article en

Abstract

Background: Physicians are hesitant to give fluid boluses to renal failure patients, which is significant given the frequency end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients develop sepsis and septic shock. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the volume of fluid given for sepsis and mortality in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ESRD. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study of CKD and ESRD patients who were admitted for sepsis was conducted across 16 West Florida hospitals. Inclusion criteria was non-pregnant adult patients admitted between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022 with CKD4, CKD5 or ESRD for sepsis and having received a fluid bolus within 6 hours of admission. Patients (n=4,265) were grouped by Standard (greater than 30mL/kg), Conservative (15-30ml/kg), or Ultra-conservative (less than 15mL/kg) fluid bolus. Sub-analysis was then performed among those patients who were either oliguric (less than 0.5mL/kg/hr) or anuric (n=2,344). Inhospital mortality was the primary outcome assessed, with secondary outcomes of ICU admission, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, and inpatient initiation of dialysis (IID). Results: In the Ultra-conservative group there was a reduction in odds ratio (OR) of vasopressor use (OR 0.723) and ICU admission (OR 0.484), with an increase in IID (OR 1.45) compared to Standard. No difference was seen in mortality or mechanical ventilation. In the Conservative group there was a reduction in vasopressor use (OR 0.717) and ICU admission (OR 0.67). No difference was seen in mortality, mechanical ventilation or IID. Within the oliguric and anuric subgroup, the Ultra-conservative group only had a significant reduction in Mechanical ventilation (OR 0.703) and ICU admissions (OR 0.536). Within the oliguric and anuric subgroup, the Conservative group had no difference in outcomes compared to Standard. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in mortality in either decreased volume group compared to Standard, although differences in ICU, vasopressor and dialysis use were noted. This study supports physician discretion for fluid bolus to patients who have poor renal function.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Florida Department of Citrus (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.