Effect of Oral Absorbent Therapy on Kidney Progression According to the Cause of CKD

Background: Oral absorbent therapy with DW-7202 (Renemezin®) and AST-120 (Kremezin®) slows the progression of CKD. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the mitigating effect of oral absorbents on CKD progression varies according to the etiology of CKD. Methods: This retrospective study included 490 patients at Konkuk University Medical Center who took absorbents for over three months between January 1, 2016, and August 31, 2023. Serum Cr levels were compared annually from the start of treatment until April 30, 2024, or the initiation of renal replacement therapy. The slope of serum Cr was compared among CKD patients with different causes using multilevel mixed-effects linear regression. Results: The most common cause of CKD was DM (54.9%), followed by HTN (22.7%), GN (7.7%), ADPKD (2.8%), and unknown etiology (11.9%). Baseline Cr levels were not significantly different among the groups (P=0.39), but were significantly different after one year (P=0.02). After drug administration, serum Cr levels significantly increased compared to baseline in all groups (Figure 1, p<0.05), with the highest increase observed in the GN group. Compared to the GN group, the slope of serum Cr increases was significantly lower in the HTN, DM, ADPKD, and unknown etiology groups (Table 1, p<0.01). Conclusion: These findings suggest that oral absorbent therapy has different effects depending on the cause of CKD. The treatment significantly alleviated CKD progression in patients with HTN, DM, ADPKD, and unknown etiology compared to those with GN. Funding: Commercial Support - DAEWOONG PHARMACEUTICAL CO.,LTDFigure 1. Changes in Serum Cr Before and After Drug Therapy Over One Year in Each Etiology Group Table 1. Comparison of the Slope of Creatinine Increase in Each Etiology Group Following Oral Absorbent Therapy - Cause of CKD Slope of Creatinine increase (µmol/L/year) (95% CI) p Value HTN 19.3 (4.63 - 33.8) <0.01 DM 28.3 (18.3 - 38.3) <0.01 GN 84.4 (62.2 - 106.6) Reference ADPKD 22.9 (-12.7 - 58.4) <0.01 Unknown 19.6 (-1.48 - 40.7) <0.01

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2024n6bs0ej7
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Oral Absorbent Therapy on Kidney Progression According to the Cause of CKD

Jee Young Lee, Hyunjin Cho, Young-Il Jo
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

Effect of Oral Absorbent Therapy on Kidney Progression According to the Cause of CKD

Jee Young Lee, Hyunjin Cho, Young-Il Jo
article en

Abstract

Background: Oral absorbent therapy with DW-7202 (Renemezin®) and AST-120 (Kremezin®) slows the progression of CKD. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the mitigating effect of oral absorbents on CKD progression varies according to the etiology of CKD. Methods: This retrospective study included 490 patients at Konkuk University Medical Center who took absorbents for over three months between January 1, 2016, and August 31, 2023. Serum Cr levels were compared annually from the start of treatment until April 30, 2024, or the initiation of renal replacement therapy. The slope of serum Cr was compared among CKD patients with different causes using multilevel mixed-effects linear regression. Results: The most common cause of CKD was DM (54.9%), followed by HTN (22.7%), GN (7.7%), ADPKD (2.8%), and unknown etiology (11.9%). Baseline Cr levels were not significantly different among the groups (P=0.39), but were significantly different after one year (P=0.02). After drug administration, serum Cr levels significantly increased compared to baseline in all groups (Figure 1, p<0.05), with the highest increase observed in the GN group. Compared to the GN group, the slope of serum Cr increases was significantly lower in the HTN, DM, ADPKD, and unknown etiology groups (Table 1, p<0.01). Conclusion: These findings suggest that oral absorbent therapy has different effects depending on the cause of CKD. The treatment significantly alleviated CKD progression in patients with HTN, DM, ADPKD, and unknown etiology compared to those with GN. Funding: Commercial Support - DAEWOONG PHARMACEUTICAL CO.,LTDFigure 1. Changes in Serum Cr Before and After Drug Therapy Over One Year in Each Etiology Group Table 1. Comparison of the Slope of Creatinine Increase in Each Etiology Group Following Oral Absorbent Therapy - Cause of CKD Slope of Creatinine increase (µmol/L/year) (95% CI) p Value HTN 19.3 (4.63 - 33.8) <0.01 DM 28.3 (18.3 - 38.3) <0.01 GN 84.4 (62.2 - 106.6) Reference ADPKD 22.9 (-12.7 - 58.4) <0.01 Unknown 19.6 (-1.48 - 40.7) <0.01

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Konkuk University (KR), Konkuk University Medical Center (KR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.