Establishment of Reference Values for Estimated Kidney Volume Using Ultrasonography in Japanese Pediatric Patients

Background: Ultrasonography serves as a noninvasive and effective screening modality for renal evaluation. Assessing renal dimensions is crucial, given the established correlation between renal function and kidney size. In pediatric populations, renal size varies with growth, necessitating the establishment of growth-specific reference values. Renal length reference values derived from ultrasonography are widely utilized in clinical practice due to their ease of measurement. However, we believe that renal length alone is inadequate for a comprehensive assessment of kidney size due to the variability in renal morphology. Consequently, we hypothesize that renal volume provides a more precise metric for evaluating kidney size and have investigated the reference values for renal volume in Japanese children with normal renal function. Methods: We measured serum creatinine levels, body height and weight, and renal long and short diameters and depths via ultrasonography in pediatric patients under 18 years of age without renal disease. We included patients with eGFR within the reference range and excluded those with body height and weight significantly deviating from the reference values. We calculated kidney volume using the average of two ultrasound measurements of kidney size, approximated as an ellipsoid: long diameter × short diameter × thickness × π / 6. Results: Out of 42 candidates, 29 patients meeting the criteria for body height, weight, and eGFR were included in the study. The median age of participants was 12 years. The strongest correlation was found between renal volume and body surface area (r2 = 0.852), followed by age, body height, weight, or body mass index. Total kidney volume, defined as the sum of bilateral kidney volumes divided by body surface area, increased with growth, with multivariate analysis identifying age as the primary influencing factor. Thus, the reference value for total kidney volume can be expressed as total kidney volume/body surface area (mL/m2) = 140 + age × 2. This reference value for renal volume showed a stronger correlation with the previously reported reference value for renal length diameter in Japanese children. Furthermore, renal volume correlates more strongly with eGFR than renal length diameter. Conclusion: Renal volume is the more precise method for evaluating renal size.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2024gb859qcs
Primary Topic
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishment of Reference Values for Estimated Kidney Volume Using Ultrasonography in Japanese Pediatric Patients

Akihiko Shirasu, Tomoko Tanaka, Akira Ashida, Hideki Matsumura et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
article

Establishment of Reference Values for Estimated Kidney Volume Using Ultrasonography in Japanese Pediatric Patients

Akihiko Shirasu, Tomoko Tanaka, Akira Ashida, Hideki Matsumura, Yuko Fujii
article en

Abstract

Background: Ultrasonography serves as a noninvasive and effective screening modality for renal evaluation. Assessing renal dimensions is crucial, given the established correlation between renal function and kidney size. In pediatric populations, renal size varies with growth, necessitating the establishment of growth-specific reference values. Renal length reference values derived from ultrasonography are widely utilized in clinical practice due to their ease of measurement. However, we believe that renal length alone is inadequate for a comprehensive assessment of kidney size due to the variability in renal morphology. Consequently, we hypothesize that renal volume provides a more precise metric for evaluating kidney size and have investigated the reference values for renal volume in Japanese children with normal renal function. Methods: We measured serum creatinine levels, body height and weight, and renal long and short diameters and depths via ultrasonography in pediatric patients under 18 years of age without renal disease. We included patients with eGFR within the reference range and excluded those with body height and weight significantly deviating from the reference values. We calculated kidney volume using the average of two ultrasound measurements of kidney size, approximated as an ellipsoid: long diameter × short diameter × thickness × π / 6. Results: Out of 42 candidates, 29 patients meeting the criteria for body height, weight, and eGFR were included in the study. The median age of participants was 12 years. The strongest correlation was found between renal volume and body surface area (r2 = 0.852), followed by age, body height, weight, or body mass index. Total kidney volume, defined as the sum of bilateral kidney volumes divided by body surface area, increased with growth, with multivariate analysis identifying age as the primary influencing factor. Thus, the reference value for total kidney volume can be expressed as total kidney volume/body surface area (mL/m2) = 140 + age × 2. This reference value for renal volume showed a stronger correlation with the previously reported reference value for renal length diameter in Japanese children. Furthermore, renal volume correlates more strongly with eGFR than renal length diameter. Conclusion: Renal volume is the more precise method for evaluating renal size.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.