Impact of Kidney Impairment Recovery on Survival of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Background: It has recently been suggested that recovery of Renal Impairment(RI) after treatment(AT) of patients(pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) is a better predictor of overall survival(OS) than RI at diagnosis(AD). Our aim is to assess the impact of RI recovery on the OS of pts with newly diagnosed(NDMM) Methods: We screened adult pts with NDMM admitted for treatment at the Sao Paulo State Cancer Institute between January 2009 and September 2018. Estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR) was determined by the 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine(Cr) equation in ml/min/1.73m2. RI was defined as eGFR<40 or serum Cr>2.0mg/dL. Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) criteria was eGFR<60ml/min/1.73m2, considering Cr in the previous three months before MM diagnosis. Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) was stratified according to the KDIGO criteria. Patients were classified into 3 groups: (1)no RI at diagnosis, (2)RI AD with recovery AT, (3)RI AD without recovery AT Results: We enrolled 429 pts. Median age was 61.7(54.1–69.5)y, 58.1% male. Median Charlson comorbidity index was 4.0(3.0–5.0). International staging system III was found in 37.9%. Novel agents(bortezomib or thalidomide) were used in 70.8% pts. eGFR AD and AT were 70.9(40.7–98.7) and 93.2(62.7-104.1)ml/min/1.73m2, respectively. AD, CKD, RI, and AKI stage 3 were observed in 26.3, 24.0, and 12.1% of patients, respectively. In the adjusted Cox regression models, among kidney variables, only the lowest eGFR AT was associated with worse OS(Table). Conclusion: The lowest eGFR AT might be a better predictor of OS than RI AD in pts with NDMM - Variables p value Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence interval) Renal impairment at diagnosis 0.54 1.11 (0.79 – 1.56) eGFR at admission 0.88 1.0 (0.99 – 1.05) Acute Kidney Injury stage 3 0.46 0.67 (0.51 – 0.89) Chronic kidney disease 0.67 0.94 (0.70 – 1.26) Renal recovery groupsNo Renal impairmentRenal impairment at diagnosis, recovery after treatmentRenal impairment at diagnosis, no recovery after treatment 0.290.830.12 1.04 (0.74 – 1.45)1.62 (0.88 – 2.96) Lowest eGFR in 6 months 0.004 0.99 (0.98 – 0.99) Each model was adjusted for age, Charlson index, international staging system stage 3, body mass index categorization, and usage of novel chemotherapy agent(thalidomide or bortezomib).eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2024bc922wv7
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Kidney Impairment Recovery on Survival of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Elerson Costalonga, Gracia Martínez, Renato A. Caires, Fernando Louzada Strufaldi et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Impact of Kidney Impairment Recovery on Survival of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Elerson Costalonga, Gracia Martínez, Renato A. Caires, Fernando Louzada Strufaldi, Fernanda Salles Seguro, Francisco Zanotelli Mattedi, Luciana Gil Lutf, Verônica T. Costa e Silva
article en

Abstract

Background: It has recently been suggested that recovery of Renal Impairment(RI) after treatment(AT) of patients(pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) is a better predictor of overall survival(OS) than RI at diagnosis(AD). Our aim is to assess the impact of RI recovery on the OS of pts with newly diagnosed(NDMM) Methods: We screened adult pts with NDMM admitted for treatment at the Sao Paulo State Cancer Institute between January 2009 and September 2018. Estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR) was determined by the 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine(Cr) equation in ml/min/1.73m2. RI was defined as eGFR<40 or serum Cr>2.0mg/dL. Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) criteria was eGFR<60ml/min/1.73m2, considering Cr in the previous three months before MM diagnosis. Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) was stratified according to the KDIGO criteria. Patients were classified into 3 groups: (1)no RI at diagnosis, (2)RI AD with recovery AT, (3)RI AD without recovery AT Results: We enrolled 429 pts. Median age was 61.7(54.1–69.5)y, 58.1% male. Median Charlson comorbidity index was 4.0(3.0–5.0). International staging system III was found in 37.9%. Novel agents(bortezomib or thalidomide) were used in 70.8% pts. eGFR AD and AT were 70.9(40.7–98.7) and 93.2(62.7-104.1)ml/min/1.73m2, respectively. AD, CKD, RI, and AKI stage 3 were observed in 26.3, 24.0, and 12.1% of patients, respectively. In the adjusted Cox regression models, among kidney variables, only the lowest eGFR AT was associated with worse OS(Table). Conclusion: The lowest eGFR AT might be a better predictor of OS than RI AD in pts with NDMM - Variables p value Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence interval) Renal impairment at diagnosis 0.54 1.11 (0.79 – 1.56) eGFR at admission 0.88 1.0 (0.99 – 1.05) Acute Kidney Injury stage 3 0.46 0.67 (0.51 – 0.89) Chronic kidney disease 0.67 0.94 (0.70 – 1.26) Renal recovery groupsNo Renal impairmentRenal impairment at diagnosis, recovery after treatmentRenal impairment at diagnosis, no recovery after treatment 0.290.830.12 1.04 (0.74 – 1.45)1.62 (0.88 – 2.96) Lowest eGFR in 6 months 0.004 0.99 (0.98 – 0.99) Each model was adjusted for age, Charlson index, international staging system stage 3, body mass index categorization, and usage of novel chemotherapy agent(thalidomide or bortezomib).eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.