Assessment of Glycemic Profiles Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients with ESKD Treated with Automated Peritoneal Dialysis

Background: The patients using automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) faced unphysiological glucose loading during nighttime, which caused difficulty in glycemic control. Data on glucose dynamics in patients using APD was still limited. This study aimed to evaluate 24-hour glycemic profiles in APD patients by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 30 APD patients were enrolled, including 10 diabetes (DM) with insulin used, 10 DM without insulin used, and 10 non-DM. All participants underwent seven days of CGM. The primary outcome was the glycemic profiles demonstrated by mean and under the curve (AUC) of interstitial glucose concentrations and the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE). Data analysis encompassed the whole 7-day period and compared daytime and nighttime Results: There were no significant differences in the mean glucose, AUC, and MAGE between the APD and non-APD periods in all groups. The mean difference in glucose during daytime and nighttime was comparable between DM with insulin and non-DM group (p= 0.364). During the APD period, the mean glucose, MAGE, and AUC were significantly higher in DM patients with insulin compared to non-DM patients (p ≤ 0.05). Dialysate glucose exposure did not influence the disparity in mean glucose concentration and AUC during the APD period in both DM (p=0.508) and non-DM groups (p =1.00). From multivariate analysis, only DM with insulin-used status was associated with mean glucose concentration (coefficient 97.84, p =0.03), while membrane transport status and glucose concentration in dialysate showed no association Conclusion: ESKD patients using APD demonstrated comparable glycemic profiles during the APD and non-APD period with unphysiological non-glucose dipping during nighttime among all DM statuses Funding: Government Support – Non-U.S.Mean glucose during APD and non-APD periods in each group

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.20242b0epxrn
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Glycemic Profiles Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients with ESKD Treated with Automated Peritoneal Dialysis

Sukit Raksasuk, Suchai Sritippayawan, Thatsaphan Srithongkul, Methawoot Khemmongkon
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

Assessment of Glycemic Profiles Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients with ESKD Treated with Automated Peritoneal Dialysis

Sukit Raksasuk, Suchai Sritippayawan, Thatsaphan Srithongkul, Methawoot Khemmongkon
article en

Abstract

Background: The patients using automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) faced unphysiological glucose loading during nighttime, which caused difficulty in glycemic control. Data on glucose dynamics in patients using APD was still limited. This study aimed to evaluate 24-hour glycemic profiles in APD patients by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 30 APD patients were enrolled, including 10 diabetes (DM) with insulin used, 10 DM without insulin used, and 10 non-DM. All participants underwent seven days of CGM. The primary outcome was the glycemic profiles demonstrated by mean and under the curve (AUC) of interstitial glucose concentrations and the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE). Data analysis encompassed the whole 7-day period and compared daytime and nighttime Results: There were no significant differences in the mean glucose, AUC, and MAGE between the APD and non-APD periods in all groups. The mean difference in glucose during daytime and nighttime was comparable between DM with insulin and non-DM group (p= 0.364). During the APD period, the mean glucose, MAGE, and AUC were significantly higher in DM patients with insulin compared to non-DM patients (p ≤ 0.05). Dialysate glucose exposure did not influence the disparity in mean glucose concentration and AUC during the APD period in both DM (p=0.508) and non-DM groups (p =1.00). From multivariate analysis, only DM with insulin-used status was associated with mean glucose concentration (coefficient 97.84, p =0.03), while membrane transport status and glucose concentration in dialysate showed no association Conclusion: ESKD patients using APD demonstrated comparable glycemic profiles during the APD and non-APD period with unphysiological non-glucose dipping during nighttime among all DM statuses Funding: Government Support – Non-U.S.Mean glucose during APD and non-APD periods in each group

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Siriraj Hospital (TH)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.