Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Lupus Nephritis

Background: Patients with Lupus Nephritis (LN) show a higher prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis and an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with healthy individuals. This study aims to examine the differences in the management of hypertension and hyperlipidemia to assess how these variations in treatment impact the prevalence of CVD in patients with LN. Methods: A retrospective data review of 128 patients over 14 years was performed. Cardiovascular risk factors were defined as the presence of at least one of the following: hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension. Treatment management was characterized by administering antihypertensive, antidiabetic, and lipid-lowering therapies. The rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, and new diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease were compared between patients with and without cardiovascular risk factors. Results: Patients with a cardiovascular risk factor (Group A) were older (Median age = 41 vs. 35 years, p = 0.038) and had a significantly longer duration of disease (Median = 65 vs. 50 months, p = 0.025) than patients without a risk factor (Group B). However, the gender distribution was similar in both groups (Male: 14% vs. 20%, p = 0.420). A higher number of patients in Group A received treatment (54.8% vs. 11.4%, p<0.001). The comparison between mean systolic blood pressure and laboratory data is shown in Table 1. Myocardial infarction and stroke were observed in 1.1% and 9.7% of patients in Group A, respectively, while no incidents were observed in Group B. Additionally, during management, 6.5% of patients in Group A were newly diagnosed with peripheral vascular disease, whereas no cases were diagnosed in Group B. However, none of these differences in the rate of CVD incidences were statistically significant. Conclusion: Our results suggest that despite effective management of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with LN, there was a higher rate of cardiovascular events. These findings might be due to the higher age and longer disease duration in our population, although more studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results. - Median/IQR (25%-75%) Group A (n=93) Group B (n=35) P value HbA1c (%) 5.65 (5.2-5.9) 5.3 (4.9-5.8) 0.087 LDL (mg/dL) 103 (82-128.6) 103 (82-128.6) 0.503 Systolic BP (mmHg) 117 (107.5-132.6) 115.17 (107.4-126) 0.168

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2024fa466nzq
Primary Topic
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Lupus Nephritis

Roy O. Mathew, Sayna Norouzi, Zohreh Gholizadeh Ghozloujeh, Amir Abdi Pour
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
article

Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Lupus Nephritis

Roy O. Mathew, Sayna Norouzi, Zohreh Gholizadeh Ghozloujeh, Amir Abdi Pour
article en

Abstract

Background: Patients with Lupus Nephritis (LN) show a higher prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis and an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with healthy individuals. This study aims to examine the differences in the management of hypertension and hyperlipidemia to assess how these variations in treatment impact the prevalence of CVD in patients with LN. Methods: A retrospective data review of 128 patients over 14 years was performed. Cardiovascular risk factors were defined as the presence of at least one of the following: hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension. Treatment management was characterized by administering antihypertensive, antidiabetic, and lipid-lowering therapies. The rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, and new diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease were compared between patients with and without cardiovascular risk factors. Results: Patients with a cardiovascular risk factor (Group A) were older (Median age = 41 vs. 35 years, p = 0.038) and had a significantly longer duration of disease (Median = 65 vs. 50 months, p = 0.025) than patients without a risk factor (Group B). However, the gender distribution was similar in both groups (Male: 14% vs. 20%, p = 0.420). A higher number of patients in Group A received treatment (54.8% vs. 11.4%, p<0.001). The comparison between mean systolic blood pressure and laboratory data is shown in Table 1. Myocardial infarction and stroke were observed in 1.1% and 9.7% of patients in Group A, respectively, while no incidents were observed in Group B. Additionally, during management, 6.5% of patients in Group A were newly diagnosed with peripheral vascular disease, whereas no cases were diagnosed in Group B. However, none of these differences in the rate of CVD incidences were statistically significant. Conclusion: Our results suggest that despite effective management of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with LN, there was a higher rate of cardiovascular events. These findings might be due to the higher age and longer disease duration in our population, although more studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results. - Median/IQR (25%-75%) Group A (n=93) Group B (n=35) P value HbA1c (%) 5.65 (5.2-5.9) 5.3 (4.9-5.8) 0.087 LDL (mg/dL) 103 (82-128.6) 103 (82-128.6) 0.503 Systolic BP (mmHg) 117 (107.5-132.6) 115.17 (107.4-126) 0.168

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Loma Linda University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.