Development of Risk-Prediction Tool for Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis and External Validation in the PDTAP Cohort

Background: Although peritoneal dialysis related peritonitis is a common complication among peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, there is no validated and recognized tool to predict disease prognosis. This limits patient-specific risk stratification and treatment decisions. Methods: A single-center peritonitis cohort was used for model derivation and Peritoneal Dialysis Telemedicine-assisted Platform (PDTAP) cohort was used for external validation. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the risk of treatment failure within 1 month of peritonitis, i.e. a composite of peritonitis-related mortality and transferring to hemodialysis. The discrimination and calibration were evaluated using C statistics, Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test, Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and calibration curves. Predictors were weighted to calculate a risk score. Results: Totally, 528 and 1190 first-episode peritonitis were included in the derivation cohort and validation cohort, respectively. A total point of 5 in basic model was developed including baseline albumin <35g/L and PD duration >25months, and a total point of 29 in extended model was developed including age >60 years old, PD duration >25months, the white cell count >300/mm3 in dialysis effluent on the day 3, and causative organism. Compared with basic model, the extended model performs better with higher C statistic [0.744 (95%CI 0.684-0.804) vs. 0.635 (95%CI 0.574-0.696), P = 0.012], HL statistic [6.73 (8df; P = 0.566) vs. 3.27 (2df; P = 0.195) and lower AIC (389.10 vs. 509.74) and BIC (421.99 vs. 522.50). Both models in the validation cohort performed similar or better discrimination and calibration, as shown in C statistics [0.620 (95% CI 0.579-0.661) in basic model; 0.871 (95%CI 0.837, 0.905) in extended model] and HL statistic [0.31 (2df; P = 0.858) in basic model; 7.86 (8df; P = 0.447) in extended model]. Conclusion: In this study, the basic and extended models for predicting treatment failure of peritonitis were established based on commonly used clinical data, which were applicable to different clinical scenarios and facilitated clinical doctors to identify high-risk individuals and adjust treatment decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.20241sth64pw
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Risk-Prediction Tool for Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis and External Validation in the PDTAP Cohort

Jie Dong, Yumeng Qiao
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

Development of Risk-Prediction Tool for Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis and External Validation in the PDTAP Cohort

Jie Dong, Yumeng Qiao
article en

Abstract

Background: Although peritoneal dialysis related peritonitis is a common complication among peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, there is no validated and recognized tool to predict disease prognosis. This limits patient-specific risk stratification and treatment decisions. Methods: A single-center peritonitis cohort was used for model derivation and Peritoneal Dialysis Telemedicine-assisted Platform (PDTAP) cohort was used for external validation. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the risk of treatment failure within 1 month of peritonitis, i.e. a composite of peritonitis-related mortality and transferring to hemodialysis. The discrimination and calibration were evaluated using C statistics, Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test, Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and calibration curves. Predictors were weighted to calculate a risk score. Results: Totally, 528 and 1190 first-episode peritonitis were included in the derivation cohort and validation cohort, respectively. A total point of 5 in basic model was developed including baseline albumin <35g/L and PD duration >25months, and a total point of 29 in extended model was developed including age >60 years old, PD duration >25months, the white cell count >300/mm3 in dialysis effluent on the day 3, and causative organism. Compared with basic model, the extended model performs better with higher C statistic [0.744 (95%CI 0.684-0.804) vs. 0.635 (95%CI 0.574-0.696), P = 0.012], HL statistic [6.73 (8df; P = 0.566) vs. 3.27 (2df; P = 0.195) and lower AIC (389.10 vs. 509.74) and BIC (421.99 vs. 522.50). Both models in the validation cohort performed similar or better discrimination and calibration, as shown in C statistics [0.620 (95% CI 0.579-0.661) in basic model; 0.871 (95%CI 0.837, 0.905) in extended model] and HL statistic [0.31 (2df; P = 0.858) in basic model; 7.86 (8df; P = 0.447) in extended model]. Conclusion: In this study, the basic and extended models for predicting treatment failure of peritonitis were established based on commonly used clinical data, which were applicable to different clinical scenarios and facilitated clinical doctors to identify high-risk individuals and adjust treatment decisions.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Peking University (CN), Peking University First Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.