At the Foot of the Hemodialysis Room: Online Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis, a Multicenter Study

Background: Several studies highlight the relevance of convective transport versus diffusive transport in the elimination of substances of higher molecular weight with great advantages in the prevention of chronic complications. Convective techniques improve them substantially. Among them, on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF-OL) is the one that eliminates more medium and high molecular weight toxins, although high-flux hemodialysis with high permeability dialyzers comes close to the advantages offered by HDF-OL. The aim of the present study is to estimate whether there are differences in the different parameters between high-flux hemodialysis (HD-FH) and OL-HDF. Methods: Multicenter, retrospective, descriptive study, analyzing the evolution in one year in both techniques. Variables of interest: demographics, Charlson comorbidity index, Karnofsky index, analytical parameters (urea kinetics, nutrition, inflammation, bone-mineral metabolism, anemia, dyslipidemia), interdialysis weight gain, diabetes, arterial hypertension and hospitalization among others. Results: A total of 1674 in OL-HDF and 889 in HD-HF. No differences in: sex, diabetes, etiology of nephropathy, physical activity, smoking, months on dialysis, dry weight, interdialysis gain. There were statistically significant differences in favor of OL-HDF in: KtV, ß2-microglobulin, hemoglobin levels and PTH. In favor of HDF-HF-HDF: albumin and aluminum. The proportion of hospitalized patients was higher in the OL-HDF group (41%) compared to the high-flow HD group (37%) (p 0.044). Conclusion: These results highlight the complexity of choosing the optimal dialysis technique, which must be customized according to the patient's specific needs and clinical situation. Although OL-HDF offers advantages in the removal of larger toxins, which is crucial to prevent chronic complications, the observed hospitalization rate suggests the need for vigilance. Funding: Other NIH Support - Diaverum Renal Services, SL, Other U.S. Government Support

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2024f104r921
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

At the Foot of the Hemodialysis Room: Online Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis, a Multicenter Study

Jorge A. Gamez de Leon, Christian Israel Alfaro Sanchez, Antoni Bordils Gil, Shaira Martínez Vaquera et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

At the Foot of the Hemodialysis Room: Online Hemodiafiltration and High-Flux Hemodialysis, a Multicenter Study

Jorge A. Gamez de Leon, Christian Israel Alfaro Sanchez, Antoni Bordils Gil, Shaira Martínez Vaquera, Gustavo Andres Useche Bonilla
article en

Abstract

Background: Several studies highlight the relevance of convective transport versus diffusive transport in the elimination of substances of higher molecular weight with great advantages in the prevention of chronic complications. Convective techniques improve them substantially. Among them, on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF-OL) is the one that eliminates more medium and high molecular weight toxins, although high-flux hemodialysis with high permeability dialyzers comes close to the advantages offered by HDF-OL. The aim of the present study is to estimate whether there are differences in the different parameters between high-flux hemodialysis (HD-FH) and OL-HDF. Methods: Multicenter, retrospective, descriptive study, analyzing the evolution in one year in both techniques. Variables of interest: demographics, Charlson comorbidity index, Karnofsky index, analytical parameters (urea kinetics, nutrition, inflammation, bone-mineral metabolism, anemia, dyslipidemia), interdialysis weight gain, diabetes, arterial hypertension and hospitalization among others. Results: A total of 1674 in OL-HDF and 889 in HD-HF. No differences in: sex, diabetes, etiology of nephropathy, physical activity, smoking, months on dialysis, dry weight, interdialysis gain. There were statistically significant differences in favor of OL-HDF in: KtV, ß2-microglobulin, hemoglobin levels and PTH. In favor of HDF-HF-HDF: albumin and aluminum. The proportion of hospitalized patients was higher in the OL-HDF group (41%) compared to the high-flow HD group (37%) (p 0.044). Conclusion: These results highlight the complexity of choosing the optimal dialysis technique, which must be customized according to the patient's specific needs and clinical situation. Although OL-HDF offers advantages in the removal of larger toxins, which is crucial to prevent chronic complications, the observed hospitalization rate suggests the need for vigilance. Funding: Other NIH Support - Diaverum Renal Services, SL, Other U.S. Government Support

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Diater (Spain) (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.