Annotating Upstream: Digital Scholars, Art History, and the Interoperable Image

Written primarily from the position of an art historian engaged in digital research and data-intensive projects, this essay explores annotations on interoperable images and the possibility for annotations as “thick data.” Images and descriptive metadata can be used and re-used in any number of contexts, but annotations are contextual fragments of scholarly insights that do not translate easily across domains. While data models for web annotation are clearly defined in a technical sense, their implementation is socially motivated. This essay gives a very brief overview the ecosystem of IIIF annotations as outgrowths of sandbox projects and Open Access initiatives at art museums and libraries. I suggest that art historians should practice “upstream annotation” by maintaining the data that constitute their annotation outputs while acknowledging the sociotechnical affordances and ephemerality of annotation spaces.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Library of Humanities
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.17217
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Annotating Upstream: Digital Scholars, Art History, and the Interoperable Image

2 citations
Open Library of Humanities
Intellectual Property Law
8.15
article

Annotating Upstream: Digital Scholars, Art History, and the Interoperable Image

article en
2 citations

Abstract

Written primarily from the position of an art historian engaged in digital research and data-intensive projects, this essay explores annotations on interoperable images and the possibility for annotations as “thick data.” Images and descriptive metadata can be used and re-used in any number of contexts, but annotations are contextual fragments of scholarly insights that do not translate easily across domains. While data models for web annotation are clearly defined in a technical sense, their implementation is socially motivated. This essay gives a very brief overview the ecosystem of IIIF annotations as outgrowths of sandbox projects and Open Access initiatives at art museums and libraries. I suggest that art historians should practice “upstream annotation” by maintaining the data that constitute their annotation outputs while acknowledging the sociotechnical affordances and ephemerality of annotation spaces.

Open Library of HumanitiesVol. 10(2)
National Gallery of Art (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Intellectual Property Law
8.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.