Using Social Media/Mainstream Media Surrounding Transplantation Education: Perspective on CKD

Background: The use of social media (SM) today provides unparalleled opportunities to provide and receive education, access to communication and engagement. SM/ mainstream media (MM) such as television, newspapers, magazines, and radio stations are also being used to prompt education surrounding specific Long-Term Conditions (LTCs). Certainly, use of SM is not limited by constraints of time and geography. Three questions being proposed here: 1) Is there a Faith stance on using SM/ MM to prompt organ donation/ transplantation education? 2) Can those who follow Faith donate organs? and 3) Does the Healthcare Scientist have a role providing the public education surrounding organ donation/ transplantation? Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) will be used to provide a LTC example. Methods: There is a need for multi-channel approaches so that the issue is a more widely known social norm in primary care, where healthcare scientists will know underlying pathologies. If those with Faith decide to donate an organ, they must do so out of free will without being morally or socially forced and without economic pressures. If the deceased indicated during life (in a will) that they do not want to donate organs, then no one is authorized to do this on the deceased person’s behalf. Results: More educational campaigns via SM/ MM involving healthcare scientists and Faith communities are required. Bridging gaps in health literacy (HL) is also important. This is where healthcare scientists have an important role, to provide health science transparency where other health professionals are challenged. Clarity of terminology to help increase HL on topics relating to organ donation/ transplantation is now especially required owing to more time being spent online. Conclusion: 1) The Faith stance on use of social media to prompt organ donation/ education has not been investigated. 2) Those who follow Faith can donate organs, and 3) More research is required to shed light on what is the most effective approach for healthcare scientists in above context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2024fawh2p0r
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Social Media/Mainstream Media Surrounding Transplantation Education: Perspective on CKD

Shahid Muhammad
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Organ Donation and Transplantation
article

Using Social Media/Mainstream Media Surrounding Transplantation Education: Perspective on CKD

Shahid Muhammad
article en

Abstract

Background: The use of social media (SM) today provides unparalleled opportunities to provide and receive education, access to communication and engagement. SM/ mainstream media (MM) such as television, newspapers, magazines, and radio stations are also being used to prompt education surrounding specific Long-Term Conditions (LTCs). Certainly, use of SM is not limited by constraints of time and geography. Three questions being proposed here: 1) Is there a Faith stance on using SM/ MM to prompt organ donation/ transplantation education? 2) Can those who follow Faith donate organs? and 3) Does the Healthcare Scientist have a role providing the public education surrounding organ donation/ transplantation? Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) will be used to provide a LTC example. Methods: There is a need for multi-channel approaches so that the issue is a more widely known social norm in primary care, where healthcare scientists will know underlying pathologies. If those with Faith decide to donate an organ, they must do so out of free will without being morally or socially forced and without economic pressures. If the deceased indicated during life (in a will) that they do not want to donate organs, then no one is authorized to do this on the deceased person’s behalf. Results: More educational campaigns via SM/ MM involving healthcare scientists and Faith communities are required. Bridging gaps in health literacy (HL) is also important. This is where healthcare scientists have an important role, to provide health science transparency where other health professionals are challenged. Clarity of terminology to help increase HL on topics relating to organ donation/ transplantation is now especially required owing to more time being spent online. Conclusion: 1) The Faith stance on use of social media to prompt organ donation/ education has not been investigated. 2) Those who follow Faith can donate organs, and 3) More research is required to shed light on what is the most effective approach for healthcare scientists in above context.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Coventry University (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.