Urine Proteomics Captures Unique Spatial Transcriptomic Signatures of ADPKD in a Mouse Model

Background: ADPKD is the most prevalent inherited kidney disease. Although the impairment of primary cilia is thought to be the cause of cyst formation, an insufficient understanding of the molecular mechanism has impeded the discovery of biomarkers reflecting PKD-specific pathology. Here, we performed multi-omics analysis to discover potential biomarkers for PKD. Methods: Spatial transcriptomics, kidney proteomics, and urine proteomics were conducted on normal and PKD model mice. For spatial transcriptomics, we applied unsupervised clustering, spatial segmentation by deep learning, and differentially expressing gene (DEG) analysis. Kidney and urine proteomics were subjected to DEG and gene ontology (GO) analysis. Results: Spatial transcriptomics revealed that the extent of transcriptomic change from normal mice to PKD mice varies depending on the kidney region, with the cortex along with the OSOM showing the most prominent changes. By stratifying the transcriptome with spatial information, we performed DEG analysis on the peri-cystic areas of each kidney region. Then, we investigated which DEG features could be captured with kidney or urine proteomics, but we found that there was little overlap between DEGs in kidney and urine proteomics. This suggests that these two types of proteomics capture different aspects of kidney pathology in PKD. In GO analysis, the common DEGs between kidney proteome and spatial transcriptome were associated with fibrosis, implying that kidney biopsy is likely to detect fibrotic status, a general signature of kidney inflammation. In contrast, the common DEGs between urine proteome and spatial transcriptome were associated with epithelium, suggesting that urine proteomics can effectively capture abnormalities in the tubular epithelium of PKD. Conclusion: Our study highlights the potential of urine proteomics in terms of not only its low invasiveness but also its effectiveness in detecting epithelial changes, which could lead to the identification of novel biomarkers reflecting the unique pathology of ADPKD.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2024amcaacqz
Primary Topic
Nuclear Structure and Function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urine Proteomics Captures Unique Spatial Transcriptomic Signatures of ADPKD in a Mouse Model

Naoshi Horiba, Yoshifumi Uesumi, Yasuhiro Ichida, Kazuhiro Morishita et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Nuclear Structure and Function
article

Urine Proteomics Captures Unique Spatial Transcriptomic Signatures of ADPKD in a Mouse Model

Naoshi Horiba, Yoshifumi Uesumi, Yasuhiro Ichida, Kazuhiro Morishita, Kohji Nagano
article en

Abstract

Background: ADPKD is the most prevalent inherited kidney disease. Although the impairment of primary cilia is thought to be the cause of cyst formation, an insufficient understanding of the molecular mechanism has impeded the discovery of biomarkers reflecting PKD-specific pathology. Here, we performed multi-omics analysis to discover potential biomarkers for PKD. Methods: Spatial transcriptomics, kidney proteomics, and urine proteomics were conducted on normal and PKD model mice. For spatial transcriptomics, we applied unsupervised clustering, spatial segmentation by deep learning, and differentially expressing gene (DEG) analysis. Kidney and urine proteomics were subjected to DEG and gene ontology (GO) analysis. Results: Spatial transcriptomics revealed that the extent of transcriptomic change from normal mice to PKD mice varies depending on the kidney region, with the cortex along with the OSOM showing the most prominent changes. By stratifying the transcriptome with spatial information, we performed DEG analysis on the peri-cystic areas of each kidney region. Then, we investigated which DEG features could be captured with kidney or urine proteomics, but we found that there was little overlap between DEGs in kidney and urine proteomics. This suggests that these two types of proteomics capture different aspects of kidney pathology in PKD. In GO analysis, the common DEGs between kidney proteome and spatial transcriptome were associated with fibrosis, implying that kidney biopsy is likely to detect fibrotic status, a general signature of kidney inflammation. In contrast, the common DEGs between urine proteome and spatial transcriptome were associated with epithelium, suggesting that urine proteomics can effectively capture abnormalities in the tubular epithelium of PKD. Conclusion: Our study highlights the potential of urine proteomics in terms of not only its low invasiveness but also its effectiveness in detecting epithelial changes, which could lead to the identification of novel biomarkers reflecting the unique pathology of ADPKD.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 35(10S)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Nuclear Structure and Function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.