Evaluation of Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS) Error Statistics Stratified by Internal Structure and Environmental Metrics

Abstract This study quantifies tropical cyclone (TC) error statistics from the Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS) across different environmental conditions (e.g., vertical wind shear) and inner-core structural metrics. A particular focus is the evolution of poorly understood aspects of internal TC structure, including vortex tilt, and their impact on forecast errors. Although previous studies have demonstrated that vortex tilt, vertical wind shear, and precipitation processes impact TC intensity and track, this is the first known study to stratify these cooperative interactions to gain insights into their relationships with forecast errors. A 3-yr retrospective sample of forecasts in the North Atlantic basin from two HAFS configurations (HAFS-A and HAFS-B) demonstrates that TCs with larger tilt magnitudes have larger forecast track errors on average than smaller tilt TCs. Smaller tilt magnitudes have larger absolute intensity errors in short-range forecasts, whereas larger tilt magnitudes tend to have larger negative intensity biases at medium range. TCs with a tilted vortex are shown to have both left-of-shear [maximizing downshear left (DSL)] and left-of-tilt-oriented positional track biases. Furthermore, those cases with greater downshear biases tend to have more convection and larger positive intensity biases, highlighting the importance of the interplay between inner-core characteristics and forecast errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weather and Forecasting
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-24-0030.1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS) Error Statistics Stratified by Internal Structure and Environmental Metrics

Ghassan J. Alaka, Andrew Hazelton, Lewis James Gramer, George R. Alvey
2 citations
Weather and Forecasting
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
0.75
article

Evaluation of Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS) Error Statistics Stratified by Internal Structure and Environmental Metrics

Ghassan J. Alaka, Andrew Hazelton, Lewis James Gramer, George R. Alvey
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study quantifies tropical cyclone (TC) error statistics from the Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS) across different environmental conditions (e.g., vertical wind shear) and inner-core structural metrics. A particular focus is the evolution of poorly understood aspects of internal TC structure, including vortex tilt, and their impact on forecast errors. Although previous studies have demonstrated that vortex tilt, vertical wind shear, and precipitation processes impact TC intensity and track, this is the first known study to stratify these cooperative interactions to gain insights into their relationships with forecast errors. A 3-yr retrospective sample of forecasts in the North Atlantic basin from two HAFS configurations (HAFS-A and HAFS-B) demonstrates that TCs with larger tilt magnitudes have larger forecast track errors on average than smaller tilt TCs. Smaller tilt magnitudes have larger absolute intensity errors in short-range forecasts, whereas larger tilt magnitudes tend to have larger negative intensity biases at medium range. TCs with a tilted vortex are shown to have both left-of-shear [maximizing downshear left (DSL)] and left-of-tilt-oriented positional track biases. Furthermore, those cases with greater downshear biases tend to have more convection and larger positive intensity biases, highlighting the importance of the interplay between inner-core characteristics and forecast errors.

Weather and ForecastingVol. 40(1)
University of Miami (US), NOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratories (US), University of Miami Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
0.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.