The influence of pragmatic function on children's comprehension of complex because- and if-sentences

Introduction In complex adverbial sentences, the connectives because and if can perform different pragmatic functions (e.g. Content, Speech-Act), although this is often overlooked in studies investigating children's acquisition of these connectives. In this study, we investigated whether pragmatic variation is responsible for some of the difficulty young children have in understanding because - and if -sentences and tested the extent to which patterns of acquisition are related to the cognitive complexity or input frequency of the different pragmatic types. Methods Ninety-two children (aged 3–5; F = 39) and 20 adults ( F = 12) took part in a forced-choice picture task where they had to identify correct pictures after hearing Content and Speech-Act because - and if -sentences. Results Results showed that children were most accurate on the sentence type where cognitive simplicity and input frequency converge ( If Content), but this pattern was largely driven by the girls in the study. For response times, children were fastest with the least cognitively complex sentence types. However, for because Speech-Act sentences, there was an inverse relationship between response time and input frequency. Discussion Taken together, these findings suggest that neither account (cognitive complexity or input frequency) can fully explain the findings. Instead, we suggest that the relative contributions of both factors are best understood in terms of the relevance of these utterances to children and the precise contexts in which children hear these utterances produced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Language Sciences
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/flang.2024.1420237
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of pragmatic function on children's comprehension of complex because- and if-sentences

Anna Theakston, Heather C. P. Lemen, Elena Lieven
1 citations
Frontiers in Language Sciences
Reading and Literacy Development
0.79
article

The influence of pragmatic function on children's comprehension of complex because- and if-sentences

Anna Theakston, Heather C. P. Lemen, Elena Lieven
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction In complex adverbial sentences, the connectives because and if can perform different pragmatic functions (e.g. Content, Speech-Act), although this is often overlooked in studies investigating children's acquisition of these connectives. In this study, we investigated whether pragmatic variation is responsible for some of the difficulty young children have in understanding because - and if -sentences and tested the extent to which patterns of acquisition are related to the cognitive complexity or input frequency of the different pragmatic types. Methods Ninety-two children (aged 3–5; F = 39) and 20 adults ( F = 12) took part in a forced-choice picture task where they had to identify correct pictures after hearing Content and Speech-Act because - and if -sentences. Results Results showed that children were most accurate on the sentence type where cognitive simplicity and input frequency converge ( If Content), but this pattern was largely driven by the girls in the study. For response times, children were fastest with the least cognitively complex sentence types. However, for because Speech-Act sentences, there was an inverse relationship between response time and input frequency. Discussion Taken together, these findings suggest that neither account (cognitive complexity or input frequency) can fully explain the findings. Instead, we suggest that the relative contributions of both factors are best understood in terms of the relevance of these utterances to children and the precise contexts in which children hear these utterances produced.

Frontiers in Language SciencesVol. 3
University of Manchester (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Reading and Literacy Development
0.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.