Predictive power of the eTBI score for 30 day outcome in elderly patients with traumatic brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common problem in elderly individuals, with significant morbidity and mortality. The elderly Traumatic Brain Injury (eTBI) score, a novel tool for predicting outcomes in elderly patients with TBI, has shown promising results in previous studies. This study aimed to validate the eTBI score in a larger cohort of elderly patients with TBI in the Middle East. We conducted a retrospective study on 337 TBI patients with a mean age of 73.04 ± 8.73, admitted to a tertiary care hospital between March 2021 and November 2022. Within 30 days of admission, the patients' conditions, including mortality and entering a vegetative state, were evaluated. The study population was split into three groups based on eTBI score: low, medium, and high risk; then patients were divided into two subgroups based on their Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS ≤ 2, GOS > 2) in 30 days from hospital admission. Poor outcomes (mortality and entering a vegetative state) occurred in 24.3% of the study population. Within 30 days of hospital admission, 88% of low-risk patients experienced some degree of improvement, while 100% of high-risk patients died or fell into a vegetative state. In the medium-risk group, there was a significant correlation between unresponsive pupil (P = 0.006), initial GCS score (P = 0.003), need for a ventilator device (P = 0.015), need for surgical treatment (P = 0.031) and poor outcomes. Despite having a low sensitivity (21% vs. 57%), the eTBI score performed well in terms of accuracy (81% vs. 88%), specificity (100 vs. 98%), positive predictive value (100% vs. 90%), and negative predictive value (80% vs. 88%) for both eTBI ≤ 0 and eTBI ≤ 3 thresholds. The eTBI score is a reliable tool for predicting outcomes in elderly patients with TBI. This scoring system has a positive predictive value of 100% in the eTBI ≤ 0 group, which shows that 100% of the patients who are predicted by the eTBI score to have a poor outcome will indeed have a poor outcome. Patients in the high-risk group should be closely monitored and provided with intensive care, while those in the low-risk group can be reassured about their prognosis. The eTBI score can also be used in conjunction with other clinical factors to inform treatment decisions for patients in the medium-risk group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77561-w
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive power of the eTBI score for 30 day outcome in elderly patients with traumatic brain Injury

Mehdi Shafiei, Mehdi Nasr Isfahani, Shiva Maleki, Alireza Amin
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
0.74
article

Predictive power of the eTBI score for 30 day outcome in elderly patients with traumatic brain Injury

Mehdi Shafiei, Mehdi Nasr Isfahani, Shiva Maleki, Alireza Amin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common problem in elderly individuals, with significant morbidity and mortality. The elderly Traumatic Brain Injury (eTBI) score, a novel tool for predicting outcomes in elderly patients with TBI, has shown promising results in previous studies. This study aimed to validate the eTBI score in a larger cohort of elderly patients with TBI in the Middle East. We conducted a retrospective study on 337 TBI patients with a mean age of 73.04 ± 8.73, admitted to a tertiary care hospital between March 2021 and November 2022. Within 30 days of admission, the patients' conditions, including mortality and entering a vegetative state, were evaluated. The study population was split into three groups based on eTBI score: low, medium, and high risk; then patients were divided into two subgroups based on their Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS ≤ 2, GOS > 2) in 30 days from hospital admission. Poor outcomes (mortality and entering a vegetative state) occurred in 24.3% of the study population. Within 30 days of hospital admission, 88% of low-risk patients experienced some degree of improvement, while 100% of high-risk patients died or fell into a vegetative state. In the medium-risk group, there was a significant correlation between unresponsive pupil (P = 0.006), initial GCS score (P = 0.003), need for a ventilator device (P = 0.015), need for surgical treatment (P = 0.031) and poor outcomes. Despite having a low sensitivity (21% vs. 57%), the eTBI score performed well in terms of accuracy (81% vs. 88%), specificity (100 vs. 98%), positive predictive value (100% vs. 90%), and negative predictive value (80% vs. 88%) for both eTBI ≤ 0 and eTBI ≤ 3 thresholds. The eTBI score is a reliable tool for predicting outcomes in elderly patients with TBI. This scoring system has a positive predictive value of 100% in the eTBI ≤ 0 group, which shows that 100% of the patients who are predicted by the eTBI score to have a poor outcome will indeed have a poor outcome. Patients in the high-risk group should be closely monitored and provided with intensive care, while those in the low-risk group can be reassured about their prognosis. The eTBI score can also be used in conjunction with other clinical factors to inform treatment decisions for patients in the medium-risk group.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
0.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.