Invariance: What Does Measurement Invariance Allow Us to Claim?

Measurement involves numerous theoretical and empirical steps-ensuring our measures are operating the same in different groups is one step. Measurement invariance occurs when the factor loadings and item intercepts or thresholds of a scale operate similarly for people at the same level of the latent variable in different groups. This is commonly assumed to mean the scale is measuring the same thing in those groups. Here we test the assumption of extending measurement invariance to mean common measurement by randomly assigning American adults (<i>N</i> = 1500) to fill out scales assessing a coherent factor (search for meaning in life) or a nonsense factor measuring nothing. We find a nonsense scale with items measuring nothing shows strong measurement invariance with the original scale, is reliable, and covaries with other constructs. We show measurement invariance can occur without measurement. Thus, we cannot infer that measurement invariance means one is measuring the same thing, it may be a necessary but not a sufficient condition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644241282982
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Invariance: What Does Measurement Invariance Allow Us to Claim?

John Protzko
13 citations
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
6.38
article

Invariance: What Does Measurement Invariance Allow Us to Claim?

John Protzko
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Measurement involves numerous theoretical and empirical steps-ensuring our measures are operating the same in different groups is one step. Measurement invariance occurs when the factor loadings and item intercepts or thresholds of a scale operate similarly for people at the same level of the latent variable in different groups. This is commonly assumed to mean the scale is measuring the same thing in those groups. Here we test the assumption of extending measurement invariance to mean common measurement by randomly assigning American adults (<i>N</i> = 1500) to fill out scales assessing a coherent factor (search for meaning in life) or a nonsense factor measuring nothing. We find a nonsense scale with items measuring nothing shows strong measurement invariance with the original scale, is reliable, and covaries with other constructs. We show measurement invariance can occur without measurement. Thus, we cannot infer that measurement invariance means one is measuring the same thing, it may be a necessary but not a sufficient condition.

Educational and Psychological MeasurementVol. 85(3)
Central Connecticut State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
6.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Invariance: What Does Measurement Invariance Allow Us to Claim? — John Protzko · Educational and Psychological Measurement (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS