Using satellite tracking to assess the use of protected areas and alternative roosts by Whooper and Bewick's Swans

Protected areas are one of the major tools used in the conservation of biodiversity, but animals are unlikely always to remain within these human‐made boundaries. Understanding when and why species choose to leave protected areas can help us to improve the effectiveness of these management tools. Here, we investigate the use of protected and non‐protected areas by two migratory species undergoing rapid wintering population changes in northwest Europe: Whooper Swans Cygnus cygnus and Bewick's Swans Cygnus columbianus bewickii . Global positioning system tags were fitted to 15 Whooper Swans in winter 2008/09 and to 18 Bewick's Swans from winter 2013/14 to 2014/15 at the Ouse Washes Special Protection Area (an internationally important roost for wintering waterbirds) and on adjacent fields in southeast England. Here, swans feed on farmland during the day but return to designated reserves to roost at night, where they receive protection from predators and disturbance within managed roost habitats. When swans roost elsewhere at alternative sites, they may face more adverse conditions, and so understanding the extent and causes of the use of alternative roosts is important for swan conservation efforts. The alternative roosting proportion, defined as the proportion of nights spent outside protected reserves, was 0.237 for Bewick's Swans and challenging to quantify accurately for Whooper Swans. A generalized additive mixed model to model repeated measurements on individuals showed that the proportion of time that Bewick's Swans spent at alternative roosts correlated positively with river level and negatively with temperature. Competition and foraging flight distances are thought to drive these relationships, as swans seek access both to roost space and to nearby feeding habitats. Our findings improve our understanding of the environmental conditions under which migratory waterbirds may choose to roost outside protected areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ibis
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13369
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using satellite tracking to assess the use of protected areas and alternative roosts by Whooper and Bewick's Swans

Larry Griffin, Kane Brides, Eileen C. Rees, Thomas H. G. Ezard et al.
1 citations
Ibis
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
0.46
article

Using satellite tracking to assess the use of protected areas and alternative roosts by Whooper and Bewick's Swans

Larry Griffin, Kane Brides, Eileen C. Rees, Thomas H. G. Ezard, Kevin A. Wood, Joshua C. Wilson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Protected areas are one of the major tools used in the conservation of biodiversity, but animals are unlikely always to remain within these human‐made boundaries. Understanding when and why species choose to leave protected areas can help us to improve the effectiveness of these management tools. Here, we investigate the use of protected and non‐protected areas by two migratory species undergoing rapid wintering population changes in northwest Europe: Whooper Swans Cygnus cygnus and Bewick's Swans Cygnus columbianus bewickii . Global positioning system tags were fitted to 15 Whooper Swans in winter 2008/09 and to 18 Bewick's Swans from winter 2013/14 to 2014/15 at the Ouse Washes Special Protection Area (an internationally important roost for wintering waterbirds) and on adjacent fields in southeast England. Here, swans feed on farmland during the day but return to designated reserves to roost at night, where they receive protection from predators and disturbance within managed roost habitats. When swans roost elsewhere at alternative sites, they may face more adverse conditions, and so understanding the extent and causes of the use of alternative roosts is important for swan conservation efforts. The alternative roosting proportion, defined as the proportion of nights spent outside protected reserves, was 0.237 for Bewick's Swans and challenging to quantify accurately for Whooper Swans. A generalized additive mixed model to model repeated measurements on individuals showed that the proportion of time that Bewick's Swans spent at alternative roosts correlated positively with river level and negatively with temperature. Competition and foraging flight distances are thought to drive these relationships, as swans seek access both to roost space and to nearby feeding habitats. Our findings improve our understanding of the environmental conditions under which migratory waterbirds may choose to roost outside protected areas.

IbisVol. 167(2)
National Oceanography Centre (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
U.S. Department of Energy, Department of Energy and Climate Change
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.