Cross-country price comparison of institutional long-term care: In search of suitable data

Abstract Background In European ageing societies, the national expenditure on institutional long-term care (LTC) has been growing for decades, currently exceeding 1% of the GDP in many countries. At the same time, however, comparative analyses of (day) prices in the nursing and residential care facilities (NRCFs) are still lacking. The data reported by international databases vary substantially in the services they cover which makes cross-country comparisons very difficult. Methods We combine publicly available data from Eurostat (System of Health Accounts), OECD and national sources on the number of recipients of LTC in NRCFs, the number of beds in NRCFs and the expenditure on LTC in NRCFs in over 20 European countries. Our aim is to compute internationally comparable daily prices of LTC in NRCFs using gross-costing approach. We first validate the data by cross-checking and documenting which health care functions and providers are reported by each country. Second, based on that we identify countries with comparable data and, third, perform a cross-country comparison of the daily spending on LTC in NRCFs. Results The reported data vary substantially with respect to their coverage. For instance, while some countries include NRCFs for all disabled people at all ages, others focus only on the NRCFs for the elderly. The ways the beds and the recipients are counted also show substantial variation. Moreover, we found inconsistencies in the reported numbers not only between but also within countries. Conclusions The considerable cross-country diversity in the LTC provision within the NRCFs poses inevitable challenges to international standardised reporting. Our analysis shows, however, that at least some of the challenges can be overcome by, e.g. improving the consistency of the reported numbers at the country level. Key messages • A consistent definition application markedly improves the comparability of data on LTC in NRCFs. • Given the rising demand for and economic importance of the LTC sector standardised data on NRCF services are greatly needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.563
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-country price comparison of institutional long-term care: In search of suitable data

Martin Zuba, Zuzanna Brzozowska, G Gredinger
European Journal of Public Health
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Cross-country price comparison of institutional long-term care: In search of suitable data

Martin Zuba, Zuzanna Brzozowska, G Gredinger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In European ageing societies, the national expenditure on institutional long-term care (LTC) has been growing for decades, currently exceeding 1% of the GDP in many countries. At the same time, however, comparative analyses of (day) prices in the nursing and residential care facilities (NRCFs) are still lacking. The data reported by international databases vary substantially in the services they cover which makes cross-country comparisons very difficult. Methods We combine publicly available data from Eurostat (System of Health Accounts), OECD and national sources on the number of recipients of LTC in NRCFs, the number of beds in NRCFs and the expenditure on LTC in NRCFs in over 20 European countries. Our aim is to compute internationally comparable daily prices of LTC in NRCFs using gross-costing approach. We first validate the data by cross-checking and documenting which health care functions and providers are reported by each country. Second, based on that we identify countries with comparable data and, third, perform a cross-country comparison of the daily spending on LTC in NRCFs. Results The reported data vary substantially with respect to their coverage. For instance, while some countries include NRCFs for all disabled people at all ages, others focus only on the NRCFs for the elderly. The ways the beds and the recipients are counted also show substantial variation. Moreover, we found inconsistencies in the reported numbers not only between but also within countries. Conclusions The considerable cross-country diversity in the LTC provision within the NRCFs poses inevitable challenges to international standardised reporting. Our analysis shows, however, that at least some of the challenges can be overcome by, e.g. improving the consistency of the reported numbers at the country level. Key messages • A consistent definition application markedly improves the comparability of data on LTC in NRCFs. • Given the rising demand for and economic importance of the LTC sector standardised data on NRCF services are greatly needed.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Public Health Institute (US), Gesundheit Österreich (AT)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.