Evaluation of a public health workplace staff psychosocial risk assessment and wellbeing initiative

Abstract Adverse psychosocial work environments can have a detrimental effect on staff wellbeing causing chronic stress leading to burnout. Despite legislation mandating regular risk assessments, only one third of workplaces assess psychosocial risks. A 2020 European report identified one of the main barriers being a reluctance to talk openly about psychosocial issues. This paper describes an evaluation of a staff psychosocial risk assessment and wellbeing initiative in a Public Health Department in Ireland. The initiative commenced in October 2022 during a period of major health service organisational change. Informed by positive organisational psychology conceptual frameworks, guided by the European Psychosocial risk assessment framework (PRIMA-EF) and utilising the HSE Work Positive (CI) survey tool it was possible to constructively identify and categorise psychosocial risks across the Public Health team. In the evaluation, a mixed methods approach was used based on Donabedian’s structures, processes and outcomes overarching framework and Nielsen’s Model of Process Evaluation Framework. The first three iterative quality improvement cycles of the intervention were reviewed. The evaluation demonstrated that all of Nielson’s three indicators for a successful organisational level staff wellbeing intervention had been met: there was evidence of improvement in both working conditions and staff wellbeing; iterative quality improvement cycles including appreciative inquiry staff collaborative engagement ensured staff views and key learning was captured; new organisational structures within the Department enabled the sustainability of this process. The evaluation indicates that the staff psychosocial risk assessment process is beneficial for staff wellbeing and that the methods used are appropriate. The resources used in this process continue to be readily available within the health service organisation. The evaluation supports continuation of this process in its present form. Key messages • This evaluation supports staff psychosocial risk assessment and mitigation processes and provides a framework for healthcare managers to implement such processes and comply with legislation. • This evaluation indicates that effective and sustainable collaborative staff engagement can be achieved using a positive focus which builds on team strengths and harnesses collective wisdom.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.599
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a public health workplace staff psychosocial risk assessment and wellbeing initiative

Lisa Ryan, Fionnuala Cooney
1 citations
European Journal of Public Health
Workplace Health and Well-being
0.85
article

Evaluation of a public health workplace staff psychosocial risk assessment and wellbeing initiative

Lisa Ryan, Fionnuala Cooney
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Adverse psychosocial work environments can have a detrimental effect on staff wellbeing causing chronic stress leading to burnout. Despite legislation mandating regular risk assessments, only one third of workplaces assess psychosocial risks. A 2020 European report identified one of the main barriers being a reluctance to talk openly about psychosocial issues. This paper describes an evaluation of a staff psychosocial risk assessment and wellbeing initiative in a Public Health Department in Ireland. The initiative commenced in October 2022 during a period of major health service organisational change. Informed by positive organisational psychology conceptual frameworks, guided by the European Psychosocial risk assessment framework (PRIMA-EF) and utilising the HSE Work Positive (CI) survey tool it was possible to constructively identify and categorise psychosocial risks across the Public Health team. In the evaluation, a mixed methods approach was used based on Donabedian’s structures, processes and outcomes overarching framework and Nielsen’s Model of Process Evaluation Framework. The first three iterative quality improvement cycles of the intervention were reviewed. The evaluation demonstrated that all of Nielson’s three indicators for a successful organisational level staff wellbeing intervention had been met: there was evidence of improvement in both working conditions and staff wellbeing; iterative quality improvement cycles including appreciative inquiry staff collaborative engagement ensured staff views and key learning was captured; new organisational structures within the Department enabled the sustainability of this process. The evaluation indicates that the staff psychosocial risk assessment process is beneficial for staff wellbeing and that the methods used are appropriate. The resources used in this process continue to be readily available within the health service organisation. The evaluation supports continuation of this process in its present form. Key messages • This evaluation supports staff psychosocial risk assessment and mitigation processes and provides a framework for healthcare managers to implement such processes and comply with legislation. • This evaluation indicates that effective and sustainable collaborative staff engagement can be achieved using a positive focus which builds on team strengths and harnesses collective wisdom.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Institute of Public Health (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Workplace Health and Well-being
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.