What matters most to healthy older adults in treatment decision making: a discrete choice experiment

Abstract Introduction Shifting to a patient centered approach is crucial for a sustainable healthcare system. Understanding individuals’ priorities is essential for personalized care, especially in critical illness. Treatment decisions are often aimed at disease-specific outcomes such as life extension or survival, while patient-specific outcomes like maintaining independence may be equally vital. How healthy older adults prioritize treatment outcomes in case of a critical illness is currently unknown. Enhanced insight into their priorities can refine healthcare policy, for more personalized care. This study investigated outcomes (attributes) prioritized in hypothetical decision-making by healthy adults over 50 yr. Methods We conducted a Discrete Choice Experiment with individuals aged ≥50, comparing six pairs of hypothetical treatments with five attributes: life expectancy, independence, pain, memory complaints and societal costs. Attribute utility was analyzed using a conditional logit model, and latent class analyses were employed to explore preferences in groups. Results In 333 participants (mean age 70 +/- 7.7) all attributes emerged as impactful with independence being strongest (p < 0.05). Increased life expectancy had positive utility, but only for a two-year increase. Negative utility was found for all other attributes except mild pain and memory complaints. Latent class analyses identified two groups (22.4% and 77.6%). Group one valued life expectancy more (p .019 vs .940), whereas the second group valued independence (p .058 vs.<.001 and societal costs (p.053 vs. <.001) more. Conclusions In a hypothetical case of life-threatening disease, for people aged ≥ 50 life expectancy was not the sole relevant outcome for treatment decisions; pain, independence and societal costs are important and should be discussed in clinical decision making or healthcare policy. Key messages • Older adults find patient-specific outcomes relevant for decision making. • Societal costs are found relevant for decision making for treatment by older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.651
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What matters most to healthy older adults in treatment decision making: a discrete choice experiment

Barbara L. van Leeuwen, Richte C. L. Schuurmann, Vera Hanewinkel, Hanneke van der Wal‐Huisman et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

What matters most to healthy older adults in treatment decision making: a discrete choice experiment

Barbara L. van Leeuwen, Richte C. L. Schuurmann, Vera Hanewinkel, Hanneke van der Wal‐Huisman, M. A. P. Kooijman, Daan Brandenbarg, Suzanne Festen, Marijke J. Nogarede, G van Leeuwen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Shifting to a patient centered approach is crucial for a sustainable healthcare system. Understanding individuals’ priorities is essential for personalized care, especially in critical illness. Treatment decisions are often aimed at disease-specific outcomes such as life extension or survival, while patient-specific outcomes like maintaining independence may be equally vital. How healthy older adults prioritize treatment outcomes in case of a critical illness is currently unknown. Enhanced insight into their priorities can refine healthcare policy, for more personalized care. This study investigated outcomes (attributes) prioritized in hypothetical decision-making by healthy adults over 50 yr. Methods We conducted a Discrete Choice Experiment with individuals aged ≥50, comparing six pairs of hypothetical treatments with five attributes: life expectancy, independence, pain, memory complaints and societal costs. Attribute utility was analyzed using a conditional logit model, and latent class analyses were employed to explore preferences in groups. Results In 333 participants (mean age 70 +/- 7.7) all attributes emerged as impactful with independence being strongest (p < 0.05). Increased life expectancy had positive utility, but only for a two-year increase. Negative utility was found for all other attributes except mild pain and memory complaints. Latent class analyses identified two groups (22.4% and 77.6%). Group one valued life expectancy more (p .019 vs .940), whereas the second group valued independence (p .058 vs.<.001 and societal costs (p.053 vs. <.001) more. Conclusions In a hypothetical case of life-threatening disease, for people aged ≥ 50 life expectancy was not the sole relevant outcome for treatment decisions; pain, independence and societal costs are important and should be discussed in clinical decision making or healthcare policy. Key messages • Older adults find patient-specific outcomes relevant for decision making. • Societal costs are found relevant for decision making for treatment by older adults.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.