Diabetes, chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases in Germany and Europe (EHIS-3 Survey)

Abstract Background We examined the prevalence of major NCD groups (diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases (CRD) and cardiovascular diseases (CVD)) as well as self-rated health (SRH) and health-related limitation in everyday activities among those with one of these NCD in Germany and Europe (average of 28 European countries (EU-28)). Methods Data was derived from the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS-3, 2019/20). Health indicators were: self-reported diabetes, CRD and CVD in the past 12 months; SRH (very good/good vs. fair, bad, very bad) and health-related limitations in usual everyday activities for at least 6 months (severe/moderate vs. no limitation). Educational level was operationalized via ISCED-11. Analyses are age-standardized to the European Standard Population 2013. Results Prevalence of major NCD in Germany were statistically significantly higher than in the EU-28: diabetes 8.1% vs. 7.1%, CRD 11.2% vs. 7.9% and CVD 6.6% vs. 5.4%. Highest prevalence was observed in the lowest educational group and lowest prevalence in the highest educational group for all of these NCD in Germany as well as in the EU-28. The proportion of a very good/good SRH among people having one of these NCD was higher in Germany compared to the EU-28: for people with diabetes 35.8% vs. 31.0%, with CRD 45.6% vs. 42.9% and with CVD 25.3% vs.19.1%. The proportion of health-related limitations among those having at least one of these NCD varied according to educational level in Germany as well as in the EU-28 with a higher prevalence among people with low educational level compared to high. Conclusions Even though prevalence of these NCD were higher in Germany, a higher proportion of very good/good SRH for people with one of these NCD was observed compared to the EU-28. Many factors such as severity of disease, disease management and care could explain this difference. Social inequalities were present not only in the prevalence of NCD but also in health-related limitations in Germany and Europe. Key messages • Prevalence of self-reported major NCD were higher in Germany while self-rated health among people having NCD was better than in Europe. • Health equity interventions in Germany and Europe are necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.221
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diabetes, chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases in Germany and Europe (EHIS-3 Survey)

Henriette Steppuhn, Hannelore Neuhauser, C Heidemann, J Waldhauer et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Diabetes, chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases in Germany and Europe (EHIS-3 Survey)

Henriette Steppuhn, Hannelore Neuhauser, C Heidemann, J Waldhauer, Jens Baumert, Ronny Kuhnert, Giselle Sarganas, Michael Thamm
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background We examined the prevalence of major NCD groups (diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases (CRD) and cardiovascular diseases (CVD)) as well as self-rated health (SRH) and health-related limitation in everyday activities among those with one of these NCD in Germany and Europe (average of 28 European countries (EU-28)). Methods Data was derived from the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS-3, 2019/20). Health indicators were: self-reported diabetes, CRD and CVD in the past 12 months; SRH (very good/good vs. fair, bad, very bad) and health-related limitations in usual everyday activities for at least 6 months (severe/moderate vs. no limitation). Educational level was operationalized via ISCED-11. Analyses are age-standardized to the European Standard Population 2013. Results Prevalence of major NCD in Germany were statistically significantly higher than in the EU-28: diabetes 8.1% vs. 7.1%, CRD 11.2% vs. 7.9% and CVD 6.6% vs. 5.4%. Highest prevalence was observed in the lowest educational group and lowest prevalence in the highest educational group for all of these NCD in Germany as well as in the EU-28. The proportion of a very good/good SRH among people having one of these NCD was higher in Germany compared to the EU-28: for people with diabetes 35.8% vs. 31.0%, with CRD 45.6% vs. 42.9% and with CVD 25.3% vs.19.1%. The proportion of health-related limitations among those having at least one of these NCD varied according to educational level in Germany as well as in the EU-28 with a higher prevalence among people with low educational level compared to high. Conclusions Even though prevalence of these NCD were higher in Germany, a higher proportion of very good/good SRH for people with one of these NCD was observed compared to the EU-28. Many factors such as severity of disease, disease management and care could explain this difference. Social inequalities were present not only in the prevalence of NCD but also in health-related limitations in Germany and Europe. Key messages • Prevalence of self-reported major NCD were higher in Germany while self-rated health among people having NCD was better than in Europe. • Health equity interventions in Germany and Europe are necessary.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Robert Koch Institute (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.