Exploring co-creator’s experiences: a multiple case study addressing workplace sedentary behaviour

Abstract Co-creation is an innovative approach for addressing complex public health issues. Co-creator’s experience of participating in co-creation can impact engagement yet research investigating co-creation experience is limited. A better understanding of co-creation experiences can inform optimal design and implementation of the co-creation process. This study’s objective was to conduct a cross-case analysis of co-creator’s experiences from 3 co-creation processes aimed at addressing workplace sedentary behaviour within 3 different small-to-medium sized companies in Scotland. Thirty-one co-creators were involved in the case study companies from Oct 2022 to Jun 2023. Data sources included observations, interviews, and researchers’ reflections. A multiple case study design enabled the exploration of co-creator’s experience across cases. A within-case thematic analysis was conducted to develop a deep understanding of cases before comparing findings between cases using Miles and Huberman’s guide to cross-case analysis. Preliminary findings indicate co-creation experiences are associated with events occurring before, during and after the co-creation process and are influenced by company context (i.e., company structure, resources and demands) and co-creation context (i.e., design and facilitation of the process). Co-creators had various motivations for their involvement. During the co-creation process there was a range of common experiences such as a sense of belonging, enjoyment and frustration. After co-creation, there was an overall sense of satisfaction accompanied by positive outcomes, including an intention to adopt healthier behaviours. Insights into co-creator’s experiences support the use of co-creation for addressing workplace sedentary behaviour. The findings have implications for researchers planning co-creation processes at small-to-medium sized companies. Tailoring co-creation to co-creator’s needs and wider company context can enhance its innovative potential. Key messages • This study’s significance lies in its qualitative cross-case analysis of co-creation experiences which enhances research rigour and enables contextualised generalisation. • The innovative potential of co-creation can be enhanced by tailoring it to meet the needs and preferences of the co-creators and considering the wider company context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1778
Primary Topic
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring co-creator’s experiences: a multiple case study addressing workplace sedentary behaviour

Lauren McCaffrey, Mira Vogelsang, Maria Giné‐Garriga, Philippa Dall et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
article

Exploring co-creator’s experiences: a multiple case study addressing workplace sedentary behaviour

Lauren McCaffrey, Mira Vogelsang, Maria Giné‐Garriga, Philippa Dall, Janneke de Boer, Bryan McCann
article en

Abstract

Abstract Co-creation is an innovative approach for addressing complex public health issues. Co-creator’s experience of participating in co-creation can impact engagement yet research investigating co-creation experience is limited. A better understanding of co-creation experiences can inform optimal design and implementation of the co-creation process. This study’s objective was to conduct a cross-case analysis of co-creator’s experiences from 3 co-creation processes aimed at addressing workplace sedentary behaviour within 3 different small-to-medium sized companies in Scotland. Thirty-one co-creators were involved in the case study companies from Oct 2022 to Jun 2023. Data sources included observations, interviews, and researchers’ reflections. A multiple case study design enabled the exploration of co-creator’s experience across cases. A within-case thematic analysis was conducted to develop a deep understanding of cases before comparing findings between cases using Miles and Huberman’s guide to cross-case analysis. Preliminary findings indicate co-creation experiences are associated with events occurring before, during and after the co-creation process and are influenced by company context (i.e., company structure, resources and demands) and co-creation context (i.e., design and facilitation of the process). Co-creators had various motivations for their involvement. During the co-creation process there was a range of common experiences such as a sense of belonging, enjoyment and frustration. After co-creation, there was an overall sense of satisfaction accompanied by positive outcomes, including an intention to adopt healthier behaviours. Insights into co-creator’s experiences support the use of co-creation for addressing workplace sedentary behaviour. The findings have implications for researchers planning co-creation processes at small-to-medium sized companies. Tailoring co-creation to co-creator’s needs and wider company context can enhance its innovative potential. Key messages • This study’s significance lies in its qualitative cross-case analysis of co-creation experiences which enhances research rigour and enables contextualised generalisation. • The innovative potential of co-creation can be enhanced by tailoring it to meet the needs and preferences of the co-creators and considering the wider company context.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Glasgow Caledonian University (GB), Ghent University (BE), Health & Life (Taiwan) (TW), Universitat Ramon Llull (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.