How does a Smoke-Free campus initiative generates changes in smoking? A theory-based evaluation

Abstract Background Smoke-free campuses (SFC) prohibit smoking and vaping on all university grounds and for all users. Despite their effectiveness in reducing smoking prevalence, passive smoking, and denormalizing tobacco use, the complex interplay between the programme activities and their impact on users and campus environments remain unclear. This study aims to improve our understanding of the transformation processes associated with SFC expected outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective qualitative study on the first SFC implemented in France by the EHESP School of Public Health. Guided by Mayne’s theory of change framework that includes ten dimensions of an impact pathway (e.g. activities, reach/reaction, capacity, behaviour changes, etc.), the research examined the chain of effects and hypotheses driving this SFC. Our dataset included internal documents (e.g. minutes of meetings, administrative documents) and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders (n = 16) involved in the development and implementation of the analysed SFC. Data is currently being analysed. Results Initial results suggest that the EHESP’s SFC activities included communication initiatives, student ambassadors, cessation support for smokers, installation of smoking shelters on campus periphery, etc. These activities were geared on capacity change (e.g. securing support and compliance among campus users, reduce smoking opportunities, promoting the use of cessation aids) and were intended to drive behaviour change (reducing smoking and facilitating cessation among students and staff). The goal of this SFC was not only to impact behaviors but also to educate future health service managers at EHESP to implement SFC policies and set an example for other institutions in France. Conclusions This study identifies some of the transformations that activities of the EHESP’s SFC can generate in students and staff in order to fulfil its outcomes. It also highlighted its expected impact on other institutions. Key messages • Understanding how a smoke-free campus generates its changes is essential in facilitating transferability of experiences to other universities. • Smoke-free campus policies can also generate a broader impact on other institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1775
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How does a Smoke-Free campus initiative generates changes in smoking? A theory-based evaluation

Karine Gallopel‐Morvan, Éric Breton, Etienne Gnonlonfin
European Journal of Public Health
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
article

How does a Smoke-Free campus initiative generates changes in smoking? A theory-based evaluation

Karine Gallopel‐Morvan, Éric Breton, Etienne Gnonlonfin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Smoke-free campuses (SFC) prohibit smoking and vaping on all university grounds and for all users. Despite their effectiveness in reducing smoking prevalence, passive smoking, and denormalizing tobacco use, the complex interplay between the programme activities and their impact on users and campus environments remain unclear. This study aims to improve our understanding of the transformation processes associated with SFC expected outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective qualitative study on the first SFC implemented in France by the EHESP School of Public Health. Guided by Mayne’s theory of change framework that includes ten dimensions of an impact pathway (e.g. activities, reach/reaction, capacity, behaviour changes, etc.), the research examined the chain of effects and hypotheses driving this SFC. Our dataset included internal documents (e.g. minutes of meetings, administrative documents) and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders (n = 16) involved in the development and implementation of the analysed SFC. Data is currently being analysed. Results Initial results suggest that the EHESP’s SFC activities included communication initiatives, student ambassadors, cessation support for smokers, installation of smoking shelters on campus periphery, etc. These activities were geared on capacity change (e.g. securing support and compliance among campus users, reduce smoking opportunities, promoting the use of cessation aids) and were intended to drive behaviour change (reducing smoking and facilitating cessation among students and staff). The goal of this SFC was not only to impact behaviors but also to educate future health service managers at EHESP to implement SFC policies and set an example for other institutions in France. Conclusions This study identifies some of the transformations that activities of the EHESP’s SFC can generate in students and staff in order to fulfil its outcomes. It also highlighted its expected impact on other institutions. Key messages • Understanding how a smoke-free campus generates its changes is essential in facilitating transferability of experiences to other universities. • Smoke-free campus policies can also generate a broader impact on other institutions.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique (FR), Arènes: politique, santé publique, environnement, médias (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.