Climate change and health vulnerability assessments to increase regional climate resilience

Abstract Background The impacts of climate change on health and healthcare systems exhibit complex interrelationships, varying across time and space. Population groups already disadvantaged due to their demographics, health, socioeconomic status, or geographical location tend to be particularly vulnerable to climate-related health risks. Our work aims to develop a method for a systematic quantitative vulnerability assessment to make regional vulnerabilities comparatively measurable. Methods Building on the WHO framework on Climate Change and Health Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessment (2021) a data mapping process was carried out to identify and validate vulnerability factors and quantitative indicators on a small-scale spatial resolution for the five dimensions: demographic, socioeconomic, biological/health, sociopolitical, and geographic/climate. Regional vulnerability scores for each indicator were calculated and visualized as geographic maps and circular barplots to allow for easily understandable interpretation. Results A set of 25 quantitative vulnerability indicators from a multitude of data sources - combining register data, survey data, and geospatial data - was compiled. Main challenges were the identification of sociopolitical vulnerability factors suitable for Austria and data availability on a small-scale level. The indicator set was used to identify regions that are particularly vulnerable due to their population composition, disease burden, and geographical location (e.g. regions in Eastern Austria with high shares of persons < 65 years of age, unemployment, and heat days). Conclusions Systematically assessing vulnerabilities in key dimensions is central to identifying regionally specific pressure points, allowing for a quantitative baseline to derive adequate and tailored climate change adaptation measures to sustain future health. Systematic assessment provides essential insights for policymakers, public health officials, and disaster management agencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.476
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate change and health vulnerability assessments to increase regional climate resilience

Ilonka Horváth, Katharina Brugger, Andrea E. Schmidt, F Durstmueller
1 citations
European Journal of Public Health
Climate Change and Health Impacts
0.31
article

Climate change and health vulnerability assessments to increase regional climate resilience

Ilonka Horváth, Katharina Brugger, Andrea E. Schmidt, F Durstmueller
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The impacts of climate change on health and healthcare systems exhibit complex interrelationships, varying across time and space. Population groups already disadvantaged due to their demographics, health, socioeconomic status, or geographical location tend to be particularly vulnerable to climate-related health risks. Our work aims to develop a method for a systematic quantitative vulnerability assessment to make regional vulnerabilities comparatively measurable. Methods Building on the WHO framework on Climate Change and Health Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessment (2021) a data mapping process was carried out to identify and validate vulnerability factors and quantitative indicators on a small-scale spatial resolution for the five dimensions: demographic, socioeconomic, biological/health, sociopolitical, and geographic/climate. Regional vulnerability scores for each indicator were calculated and visualized as geographic maps and circular barplots to allow for easily understandable interpretation. Results A set of 25 quantitative vulnerability indicators from a multitude of data sources - combining register data, survey data, and geospatial data - was compiled. Main challenges were the identification of sociopolitical vulnerability factors suitable for Austria and data availability on a small-scale level. The indicator set was used to identify regions that are particularly vulnerable due to their population composition, disease burden, and geographical location (e.g. regions in Eastern Austria with high shares of persons < 65 years of age, unemployment, and heat days). Conclusions Systematically assessing vulnerabilities in key dimensions is central to identifying regionally specific pressure points, allowing for a quantitative baseline to derive adequate and tailored climate change adaptation measures to sustain future health. Systematic assessment provides essential insights for policymakers, public health officials, and disaster management agencies.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Public Health Institute (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
0.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.