Envisioning telemedicine in the EU health systems: Insights from policy experts and cancer patients

Abstract Background Conducted as part of WP4 (Sustainability) of the eCAN Joint Action, the aim of this foresight exercise was to understand how telemedicine services in EU-Member States (MS) could be implemented in a patient-centric way to tackle cancer. Methods Based on a literature review, we identified factors that impact on the implementation of telemedicine in EU MS; these were integrated to an online survey. Health policy experts were invited to rank 34 factors using a 7-point Likert scale to better understand the barriers and facilitators of telemedicine services at the health system level, whilst patient associations ranked 28 other factors to capture end-users’ view. Next, survey respondents were invited to a foresight workshop to collect qualitative data and gain a forward-looking perspective. Results 20 health policy experts working in digital health across 14 EU MS, predominantly from Ministries of Health, and 8 cancer patient associations from 5 EU MS responded to the surveys. For a sustainable integration of telemedicine services in the EU, policy experts recommend developing a clear legal framework, embracing a hybrid healthcare model, and enhancing digital literacy. They stress the importance of telemedicine as a complementary tool, advocating for solid IT infrastructure, privacy safeguards, and the integration of health equity. Similarly, cancer patients emphasise the importance of being able to choose between telemedicine and in-person visits, focusing on personal interaction. They advocate for the involvement of patients in the design and testing of telemedicine services, ensuring solutions meet their preferences. Conclusions Policy experts and patients are in favour of hybrid models for cancer care. Recommended public health actions include: i) develop legal frameworks to complement in-person care with telemedicine; ii) boost digital literacy and IT infrastructure, ensuring privacy and health equity; and iii) involve patients in design for tailored services. Key messages • Both the EU Member States and cancer patients view telemedicine as a useful and complementary tool, however, not as a replacement for in-person healthcare services. • Both the EU Member States and cancer patients champion telemedicine with a focus on equity, privacy, digital literacy and a hybrid model of care that respects patient preferences for cancer treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.338
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Envisioning telemedicine in the EU health systems: Insights from policy experts and cancer patients

Christina E. Plomariti, Tuğçe Schmitt, Panagiotis Bogiatzidis, Marie Delnord et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Envisioning telemedicine in the EU health systems: Insights from policy experts and cancer patients

Christina E. Plomariti, Tuğçe Schmitt, Panagiotis Bogiatzidis, Marie Delnord, Claudia Habl, Anita Gottlob, Katharina Habimana, Aliki‐Eleni Farmaki, Victoria Leclercq, Marc Van den Bulcke
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Conducted as part of WP4 (Sustainability) of the eCAN Joint Action, the aim of this foresight exercise was to understand how telemedicine services in EU-Member States (MS) could be implemented in a patient-centric way to tackle cancer. Methods Based on a literature review, we identified factors that impact on the implementation of telemedicine in EU MS; these were integrated to an online survey. Health policy experts were invited to rank 34 factors using a 7-point Likert scale to better understand the barriers and facilitators of telemedicine services at the health system level, whilst patient associations ranked 28 other factors to capture end-users’ view. Next, survey respondents were invited to a foresight workshop to collect qualitative data and gain a forward-looking perspective. Results 20 health policy experts working in digital health across 14 EU MS, predominantly from Ministries of Health, and 8 cancer patient associations from 5 EU MS responded to the surveys. For a sustainable integration of telemedicine services in the EU, policy experts recommend developing a clear legal framework, embracing a hybrid healthcare model, and enhancing digital literacy. They stress the importance of telemedicine as a complementary tool, advocating for solid IT infrastructure, privacy safeguards, and the integration of health equity. Similarly, cancer patients emphasise the importance of being able to choose between telemedicine and in-person visits, focusing on personal interaction. They advocate for the involvement of patients in the design and testing of telemedicine services, ensuring solutions meet their preferences. Conclusions Policy experts and patients are in favour of hybrid models for cancer care. Recommended public health actions include: i) develop legal frameworks to complement in-person care with telemedicine; ii) boost digital literacy and IT infrastructure, ensuring privacy and health equity; and iii) involve patients in design for tailored services. Key messages • Both the EU Member States and cancer patients view telemedicine as a useful and complementary tool, however, not as a replacement for in-person healthcare services. • Both the EU Member States and cancer patients champion telemedicine with a focus on equity, privacy, digital literacy and a hybrid model of care that respects patient preferences for cancer treatment.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(Supplement_3)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Regional Health (US), Public Health Institute (US), Gesundheit Österreich (AT), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (GR), Sciensano (Belgium) (BE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.